• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
James J. Moloney

James J. Moloney

Partner, Orange County

[email protected]

+1 949.451.4343

James J. Moloney is a partner in the Orange County office of Gibson Dunn and serves as Co-Chair of the firm's Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Practice Group. Jim advises public companies, their boards and committees of independent directors in connection with reporting under securities laws, establishing and maintaining corporate compliance programs, mergers, SEC and other regulatory investigations, and stock exchange proceedings. He works closely with the firm’s Litigation Practice Group on securities litigation matters, including both internal and external reviews and investigations.

View Full Profile

Did You Check The Right Box? New SEC Guidance on Clawback Disclosures

April 16, 2025 | Posted by Gina Hancock; Krista P. Hanvey; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

On April 11, 2025, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) published six new Compliance & Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) relating to the Form 10-K restatement and clawback analysis check boxes and the related disclosures under Item 402(w) of Regulation S-K available here.

As a refresher, the cover of Form 10-K includes two check boxes—the first one indicates when the financial statements included in the Form 10-K reflect the correction of an error to previously issued financial statements and the second one when those error corrections are restatements that required a clawback recovery analysis under Rule 10D-1(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (i.e. pursuant to the registrant’s mandatory clawback policy). In addition, Item 402(w) of Regulation S-K requires registrants to include narrative disclosure regarding the clawback policy analysis in the event of a restatement that covers how the recoverable amount was calculated, the value of any recoverable amount that remains outstanding and whether the registrant is relying on the impracticability of recovery exception (and the justification of such reliance).

Below is a summary of the new C&DIs:

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Updates Guidance on Lock-Ups, Written Consents and Financing Matters in Tender Offers and Business Combination Transactions

March 7, 2025 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Tull Florey; Mellissa Campbell Duru Topic(s): Corporate Governance; M&A; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 6, 2025, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) published several updates to its Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) relating to merger transactions and tender offers.  Key updates are set forth below.

Read More

SEC Signals Potential Strategy Shift in Climate Disclosure Rule Litigation

February 14, 2025 | Posted by Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes; Ronald O. Mueller; Lori Zyskowski; Thomas J. Kim; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Environmental/Climate Change; ESG; Securities Regulation

On Tuesday, Mark Uyeda, Acting Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), issued a statement signaling potential updates to the SEC’s position in the ongoing legal challenges to its climate disclosure rule. As previously reported, the SEC stayed its climate disclosure rule last year pending the outcome of the related consolidated litigation before the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals.

Read More

SEC Lawsuit Against Elon Musk: Late is Late . . . Whether You Report on Schedule 13G or 13D

January 31, 2025 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Disclosure; Securities Regulation

In an interesting development in the week leading up to the 2025 inauguration of President Donald Trump, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced a legal action against Elon Musk. In its complaint filed with the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia (the “Court”) on January 14, 2025 (the “Complaint”), the SEC alleges Musk failed to timely file a Schedule 13D after acquiring over five percent of the outstanding shares of common stock (the “Shares”) of Twitter, Inc. (the “Company” or “Twitter”). The late filing resulted in a violation of Section 13(d)(1) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”) and Rule 13d-1(a) thereunder, both of which impose strict liability for such reporting failures. The SEC is seeking permanent injunctive relief, disgorgement of any ill-gotten gains, prejudgment interest, and civil penalties.

Read More

Latest SEC Enforcement Sweep Picks Up 34 Reporting Persons for Numerous Late and Missing 13F and 13H Filings

September 29, 2024 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Brian J. Lane; Eric Scarazzo Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") announced charges against 34 reporting persons for late and missing filings on Form 13F and Form 13H earlier this month. The entities and individuals charged agreed to settlements with the SEC requiring payments of $7.2 million in penalties.

Read More

Early Insights from the Insider Trading Policies Filed by S&P 500 Companies under the SEC’s New Exhibit Requirement

September 9, 2024 | Posted by Aaron K. Briggs; Thomas J. Kim; Brian J. Lane; Julia Lapitskaya; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Michael A. Titera; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

​​I.  Introduction

For fiscal years beginning on or after April 1, 2023, domestic public companies are required to disclose whether they have adopted insider trading policies and procedures governing the purchase, sale, and/or other dispositions of their securities by their directors, officers and employees, or the companies themselves, and if so to file those policies and procedures as an exhibit to their annual reports on Form 10-K.[1] While calendar year companies must comply with these requirements in their Form 10-K for, or proxy statement following, the fiscal year ending December 31, 2024, 49 S&P 500 companies had addressed these requirements in filings as of June 30, 2024.[2]   

Read More

Important Reminder to 13F Filers – New Vote Reporting Disclosures Required on Form N-PX (due August 31, 2024)

July 30, 2024 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Disclosure; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; Say on Pay; Securities Regulation

​As a quick reminder, all institutional investment managers filing 13F reports under the Exchange Act (“13F Filers") are subject to a new requirement this year to file a Form N-PX by August 31, 2024.  Form N-PX includes disclosures regarding certain executive compensation-related proposals described below.

Read More

Reminder to 13G Filers on Upcoming Phase-In of SEC Amendments to Beneficial Ownership Filing Deadlines

May 29, 2024 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

​As previously noted in our client alert, certain of the SEC amendments to beneficial ownership reporting rules adopted in October 2023 will go into effect on September 30, 2024. As a quick reminder, for Passive Investors (i.e., those reporting on Schedule 13G pursuant to Rule 13d-1(c) who beneficially own less than 20%) and Qualified Institutional Investors (“QIIs")

Read More

SEC Division of Corporation Finance Director Erik Gerding Offers Guidance on Form 8-K Disclosure of Cybersecurity Incidents

May 22, 2024 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Thomas J. Kim; Lori Zyskowski; Julia Lapitskaya; James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

​As detailed in our client alert, the SEC adopted cybersecurity disclosure rules on July 26, 2023 that require disclosure of material cybersecurity incidents under new Item 1.05 of Form 8-K. If a company determines that a cybersecurity incident is material, it is required to disclose the incident within four (4) business days of such determination. In addition, such determination is required to be made “without unreasonable delay after discovery of the incident.”

Read More

Reminder For Resource Extraction Issuers: Form SD Due September 2024

April 16, 2024 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Harrison Tucker Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

​As previously reported on our Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor on December 16, 2020 (available here), the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") adopted the final rule (available here) requiring additional disclosures by public companies that engage in the commercial development of oil, natural gas or minerals. Under the final rule, domestic or foreign “resource extraction issuers" are required to annually disclose information about certain payments made to foreign governments or the U.S. federal government on Form SD.

Read More

Fifth Circuit Stay of the SEC’s Climate Disclosure Rule Dissolved

March 22, 2024 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Disclosure; ESG; Securities Regulation

On March 21, 2024, the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation randomly selected the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit to hear all cases challenging the Securities and Exchange Commission’s final climate disclosure rule. Within the first ten days after the rule’s issuance, nine petitions were filed, in six different circuits, challenging the rule.

Read More

Recent SEC Enforcement Action Underscores Importance of Timely Filing of 13D/G Beneficial Ownership Reports

March 6, 2024 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Disclosure; Securities Regulation

​On March 1, 2024, the SEC announced an enforcement action against an investment advisory firm (“Investor"), stemming from its failure to promptly convert from a Schedule 13G to 13D after forming  a “control" purpose within the meaning of Section 13(d) of the Exchange Act and Rule 13d-1 thereunder.[1]

Read More

Fifth Circut Strikes Down SEC’s New Buyback Disclosure Rule

December 20, 2023 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On December 19, 2023, the Fifth Circuit vacated the SEC’s Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rule (the “Repurchase Rule") in its entirety. The Repurchase Rule, discussed further in our Client Alert, would have required companies to disclose objectives or rationales and certain additional information for all share repurchases conducted during the quarter on Form 10-Q and Form 10-K and required quarterly disclosure regarding a company’s adoption or termination of any Rule 10b5-1 trading plans.

Read More

SEC Stays Effectiveness of New Buyback Disclosure Rule; Fifth Circuit Denies SEC’s Request for Additional Time to Correct Rules

November 28, 2023 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

​On November 22, 2023, the SEC announced that it had issued an order indefinitely postponing the effectiveness of the Share Repurchase Disclosure Modernization rule (the “Repurchase Rule"), pending further SEC action. At the same time, the SEC asked the Fifth Circuit for additional time to respond to the court’s order that the SEC correct deficiencies in the Repurchase Rule by November 30. The court denied that motion on November 26. As a result, the SEC has until November 30 to correct the deficiencies the court had found with the SEC’s rulemaking, after which we expect the court will consider a renewed motion from the petitioners to vacate the Repurchase Rule.

Read More

Division of Corporation Finance Offers New Guidance on Application of the SEC’s Universal Proxy Rules Ahead of the 2024 Proxy Season

November 22, 2023 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Michael A. Titera; Julia Lapitskaya Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Proxy Access; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation; Shareholder Proposals

As discussed in our previous client alert, the universal proxy rules that went effective on August 31, 2022 require proxy cards distributed by both public companies and nominating shareholders in contested director elections to include both sides’ director nominees, such that shareholders casting their vote can “mix-and-match" nominees from each of the company’s and the dissident’s slate of director nominees.

Read More

SEC Rolls Out Enforcement Sweep Against Delinquent Filers Ahead of Recent 13D/G Amendments

October 31, 2023 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Brian J. Lane; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Registered Securities Offerings; Securities Regulation

Late last month, shortly before adopting amendments to Regulation 13D/G, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") announced civil charges against several officers, directors, and major shareholders of public companies for failing to satisfy their timely reporting obligations. The SEC also charged the affiliated public companies for contributing to the reporting failures by insiders.

Read More

Preparing for a Potential Government Shutdown: Initial Impacts on SEC Operations

September 29, 2023 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Registered Securities Offerings; Securities Regulation; Shareholder Proposals; Underwriters and Agents

A looming partial shutdown of the federal government is on track to occur at 12:01 a.m. ET on Sunday, October 1, 2023, if Congress is unable to reach agreement on legislation funding the government. The SEC Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) announced that in the event of a government shutdown, the SEC’s “activities will be extremely limited” and specifically, that it would not be able to accelerate the effectiveness of registration statements. The Division advised that, to the extent possible, registrants with pending registration or offering statements that have satisfied the requirements to request acceleration of the effective date should consider requesting effectiveness or qualification while the Division continues its normal operations.

Read More

EDGAR Next: SEC Proposes Changes to EDGAR Filer Access and Account Management Procedures

September 28, 2023 | Posted by Michael A. Titera; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​Following a request for comment on the topic in 2021, on September 13, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") proposed amendments to Rules 10 and 11 of Regulation S-T and Form ID regarding potential technical changes to Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval System (“EDGAR") filer access and account management (referred to by the SEC as “EDGAR Next"). 

Read More

Form 10-Q Updates and Reminders

July 17, 2023 | Posted by Michael A. Titera; Ronald O. Mueller; Thomas J. Kim; Lori Zyskowski; Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Julia Lapitskaya; Aaron K. Briggs Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

As many companies prepare their quarterly reports on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2023, we offer the following observations and reminders regarding new disclosure requirements taking effect for this reporting period, as well as risk factor considerations that may be relevant to upcoming Form 10-Q reporting.  For convenience, this publication also includes a summary of certain upcoming compliance dates for public companies.

Read More

New Vote Reporting Disclosures Required on Form N-PX – Vote Reports Now Extend to All 13F Filers – No Longer Limited to Registered Funds

July 10, 2023 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; Securities Regulation

​In November 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) adopted amended rules that update the existing reporting requirements on Form N‑PX and create new Form N‑PX reporting requirements for institutional investment managers.[1]  The purpose of these amendments is to increase transparency surrounding proxy voting records.  Prior to the adoption of this new rule, registered investment management companies (“Funds”), such as mutual funds and exchange traded funds, were required to publicly report their annual proxy voting records on Form N‑PX.

Read More

SEC Publishes C&DIs Addressing Tender Offer Issues

March 17, 2023 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Disclosure; Securities Regulation

​On March 17, 2023, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission released over thirty questions and answers in the form of Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs") addressing various tender offer issues.

Read More

EDGAR Ready to Accept Online Form 144 Filings Ahead of Deadline for Electronic Filing Requirement

October 11, 2022 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Capital Markets; Securities Regulation

Since September 23, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (“EDGAR") system has been ready to accept electronic Form 144 filings, pursuant to the SEC’s recent amendments requiring certain Forms 144 to be filed electronically. Filers have approximately six months from September 2022 to transition to electronic filing of Forms 144. The SEC’s compliance date is April 13, 2023. 

Read More

SEC Raises Annual Gross Revenue Amount in the Definition of Emerging Growth Company

September 20, 2022 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Capital Markets; Securities Regulation

On September 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) amended its rules to
implement inflation-adjusted amendments to Rule 405 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1932, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and raised the annual gross revenue amount in the definition of “emerging growth company” (“EGC”) from $1,070,000,000 to $1,235,000,000. The final rule (available

Read More

Division of Corporation Finance Issues Interpretive Guidance on the SEC’s Universal Proxy Rules

August 29, 2022 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Proxy Access; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation; Shareholder Proposals

On August 31, 2022, the universal proxy rules adopted late last year by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") will become effective.  As discussed in our previous client alert, the rules require proxy cards distributed by both public companies and nominating shareholders in contested director elections to include both sides’ director nominees, such that shareholders casting their vote can “mix-and-match" nominees from each of the company’s and the dissident’s slate of director nominees.  

Read More

Update on Changes in SEC Commissioners

July 21, 2022 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Thomas J. Kim; Ronald O. Mueller; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Securities Regulation

On July 18, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that Jaime Lizárraga was sworn in as the SEC’s newest Commissioner following the departure of Allison Herren Lee on July 15. The current SEC Commissioners are as follows, in order of reverse seniority:

Read More

SEC Division of Corporation Finance Issues Interpretations Addressed to SPACs’ Business Combinations

March 24, 2022 | Posted by Gerry Spedale; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Disclosure; M&A; Miscellaneous; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

On March 22, 2022, the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) that primarily focus on filing and disclosure issues that arise in the context of merger transactions by special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs”).

Read More

SEC Proposes Rule to Amend Beneficial Ownership Reporting

February 22, 2022 | Posted by Julia Lapitskaya; James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Corporate Governance; M&A; Securities Regulation

On February 10, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) announced a proposed rule to modernize the rules governing beneficial ownership reporting

Read More

Now Available: Considerations for Preparing Your 2021 Form 10-K

January 21, 2022 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Brian J. Lane; Elizabeth A. Ising; Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera; Thomas J. Kim; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Environmental/Climate Change; ESG; Financial Statements; Human Capital Management; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

​As we do each year, we offer our observations on new developments and recommended practices for calendar-year filers to consider in preparing their Form 10-K. This alert reviews the recent amendments to Regulation S-K adopted by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) and discusses how public companies are reacting to these new requirements.

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules on Insider Trading, Rule 10b5-1 and Share Repurchases

December 23, 2021 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Lori Zyskowski; Thomas J. Kim; Brian J. Lane; Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

On December 15, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”) held a virtual open meeting where it considered four rule proposals, including two that are particularly pertinent to all public companies: (i) amendments regarding Rule 10b5-1 insider trading plans and related disclosures and (ii) new share repurchase disclosures rules.

Read More

Recent SEC Amendments Bring Changes to Filing Fee Disclosure and Payment Methods

October 19, 2021 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; M&A; Miscellaneous; Registered Securities Offerings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

On October 13, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to modernize filing fee disclosure for certain forms and schedules, as well as update payment methods for fees related to these filings. The final rule highlighted three primary goals of the amendments: (i) update disclosure requirements related to filing fees in order to provide more certainty to filers that the proper fee was calculated and facilitate the SEC staff’s review of such fee; (ii) modernize the payment method for filing fees and reduce the cost and burden on processing fee payments; and (iii) permit filers to reallocate previously paid filing fees in more situations than what was previously permitted. An overview of these changes is provided below. The amendments also contained certain technical, conforming and clarifying changes related to filing fee-related instructions and information.

Read More

SEC Staff Scrutiny of Climate Change Disclosures Has Arrived: What to Expect And How to Respond

September 19, 2021 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Brian J. Lane; Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Lori Zyskowski; Michael A. Titera; Thomas J. Kim; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Disclosure; Environmental/Climate Change; ESG; Securities Regulation

Recently, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance has issued a number of comment letters relating exclusively to climate-change disclosure issues.  The letters we have seen to date comment on companies’ most recent Form 10-K filings, including those of calendar year companies who filed their Form 10-K more than 6 months ago, and have been issued by a variety of the Division’s industry review groups, including to companies that are not in particularly carbon-intensive industries.  Many of the climate change comments appear to be drawn from the topics and considerations raised in the SEC’s 2010 guidance on climate change disclosure, as reflected in the sample comments that we have attached in the annex to this alert. We expect this is part of a larger Division initiative because the letters are similar (although not identical), contain relatively generic comments, and have been issued in close proximity to one another.  Accordingly, it is reasonable to expect that additional comment letters will be issued in the coming weeks and months.

Read More

SEC Chair Lays Out a Climate- and ESG-Oriented Agenda and Calls for Comments on Mandatory Climate-Related Disclosure Rules

March 16, 2021 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Thomas J. Kim; Lori Zyskowski; Michael Scanlon Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

On March 15, 2021, the Acting Chair of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), Allison Herren Lee, gave a speech entitled “A Climate for Change: Meeting Investor Demand for Climate and ESG Information at the SEC,”[1] in which she sets forth a near-term regulatory agenda for the SEC that centers on climate and Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) topics. On the same day, she also jump-started the regulatory process toward adopting potentially extensive new disclosure requirements for public companies on climate-change matters by issuing a request for comments on 15 broad issues.[2]

Read More

Now Available: Considerations for Preparing Your 2020 Form 10-K

February 4, 2021 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Elizabeth A. Ising; Thomas J. Kim; Brian J. Lane; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Michael Scanlon; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Disclosure; Financial Statements; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

​As we do each year, we offer our observations on new developments and recommended practices for calendar-year filers to consider in preparing their annaul report on Form 10-K. In addition to the many challenges of the past year, the SEC adopted and provided guidance on a number of changes to public company reporting obligations impacting disclosures in the 10-K for 2020. In particular, we discuss the recent amendments to Regulation S-K, disclosure considerations in light of COVID-19, a number of technical considerations that may impact your Form 10-K, and other considerations in light of recent and pending changes in the executive branch and at the SEC.​  The full memo is available at the following link:

Read More

SEC Adopts New Rule Relating to Submissions through EDGAR and Electronic and Remote Online Notarization

December 22, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On December 11, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") announced its adoption of a new rule under Regulation S-T in connection with its administration of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR") to promote the reliability and integrity of EDGAR submissions, and also the adoption of revisions to Volumes I and II of the EDGAR Filer Manual and related rules under Regulation S-T, including provisions regarding electronic notarizations and remote online notarizations, which include electronic signatures.

Read More

SEC Provides New Option for Extending Confidential Treatment

September 11, 2020 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Hillary H. Holmes; Ronald O. Mueller; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​The SEC just made it a little easier to maintain the confidentiality of sensitive information that is the subject of a soon-to-expire confidential treatment order. As discussed below, under the SEC’s latest guidance a company can now use the simplified confidential treatment process available for new exhibits when seeking to extend confidential treatment of previously filed exhibits.

Read More

SEC Issues Guidance Regarding Submission of Supplemental Materials and Confidential Treatment Requests in Light of COVID-19 Concerns

August 18, 2020 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Corporate Governance; JOBS Act; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On August 4, 2020, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") issued guidance relating to the submission of supplemental materials and information subject to Rule 83 confidential treatment requests in light of COVID-19 concerns (available here). The Division is providing a temporary secure file transfer process for the submission of supplemental materials pursuant to Securities Act Rule 418 and Exchange Act Rule 12b-4, including supplemental materials subject to a Rule 83 confidential treatment request. This secure file transfer process is a temporary accommodation to the SEC’s rules and procedures for receiving confidential information (as discussed in a prior client alert, available here), due to ongoing health and safety concerns related to COVID-19.

Read More

SEC Staff provides additional disclosure guidance related to COVID-19 impact

June 25, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Michael A. Titera; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Audit Committee; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​Due to the ongoing assessment of the impact of COVID-19 on companies’ operations, liquidity and capital resources and overall economic and market conditions, companies should take special care in preparing for their quarterly reporting. To aid in this effort, the staff (the “Staff") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") has posted a new set of questions that companies should consider in evaluating whether certain disclosures should be included in their earnings release and, in light of its potential materiality, in the management discussion and analysis (“MD&A") included in the periodic reports (e.g., the Form 10-Q for second quarter 2020).

Read More

SEC Releases COVID-19 FAQs to Provide Guidance on Disclosure Requirements and Form S-3

May 11, 2020 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

The SEC Division of Corporation Finance staff (the “Staff") has released a list of FAQs on COVID-19 for registrants (available here) that provides guidance on required disclosures under the SEC’s COVID-19 Order and the application of such order to Form S-3 filings.  The FAQs and responses provided by the Staff as of May 5, 2020 are summarized below—please follow the link above to read the full text of the FAQs.

Read More

Nasdaq Provides Temporary Exemption from Certain Shareholder Approval Requirements in Response to COVID-19

May 11, 2020 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On May 4, 2020, the SEC announced (available here) that it has immediately approved proposed rule changes by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq") that provide listed companies with a temporary exception from certain shareholder approval requirements under the Nasdaq Rules (the “Rules") through and including June 30, 2020 (available here). 

Read More

SEC Amends Accelerated and Large Accelerated Filer Definitions to Reduce Burdens on Smaller Reporting Companies – Effective April 27, 2020

March 30, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On March 12, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission announced (available here) the adoption of a final rule (available here) amending the “accelerated filer” and “large accelerated filer” definitions. The amendments will be effective April 27, 2020 and first impact annual reports on Form 10-K due after the effective date.

Read More

Coronavirus Disease 2019 Update: Impact under Nasdaq Rules of SEC Relief to Affected Companies

March 12, 2020 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous

​On March 8, 2020, we discussed on a post (available here) about the announcement (available here) by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) that providedconditional regulatory relief (Order available here) for certain filing obligations under the federal securities laws to companies impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”).

Read More

SEC Provides Conditional Regulatory Relief and Additional Disclosure Guidance for Companies Affected by the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19)

March 8, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 4, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) announced (available here) that it is providing conditional regulatory relief (Order available here) for certain filing obligations under the federal securities laws to companies impacted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (“COVID-19”), including “U.S. companies located in the affected areas, as well as companies with operations in those regions.

Read More

SEC Announces Proposed Amendments to MD&A and Guidance on Key Performance Indicators and Metrics; Commissioners Debate Addition of Sustainability Disclosure Requirements

February 7, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

​On January 30, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued proposed amendments to simplify the requirements of Regulation S-K and an interpretative release relating to Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”).

Read More

SEC Proposes Revised Resource Extraction Rules, Again!

December 28, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

 

[Updated January 18, 2020]

On December 18, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) released proposed rules (available here) relating to the disclosure of payments by resource extraction issuers. The SEC’s release sets forth the tortured more-than-seven-year history of this rulemaking (see previous Gibson Dunn posts regarding this topic in 2015, 2013 and 2010). The SEC is proposing these rules by mandate pursuant to Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) after having earlier adopted versions of the rules vacated in 2012 by the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, a ruling which the SEC declined to appeal, and disapproved in 2016 by Congress pursuant to its authority under the Congressional Review Act. While Congress disapproved of the adopted rules in 2016, it did not repeal Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Act, so the SEC’s rulemaking mandate remained in place. Revised rules cannot be substantially similar to the ones disapproved by Congress under the Congressional Review Act. As such, the newly proposed rules substantially differ from the previously adopted rules, and the differences are discussed in more detail below.

Read More

EDGAR Updates Change Filer Password Requirements and Increase Character Length of Certain Cover Page Tags

October 10, 2019 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On September 30, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") went live with EDGAR Release 19.3 (announcement available here) and made related changes to the EDGAR Filer Manual (announcement available here).  Two notable changes are summarized below. 

Read More

SEC Issues New Guidance for Proxy Advisors and Investment Advisers Engaged in the Proxy Voting Process

August 23, 2019 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Brian J. Lane; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

​​On August 21, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the Commission) issued two releases (the Releases) regarding two elements of the proxy voting process that are influenced by proxy advisory firms: proxy voting advice issued by proxy advisors (available here) and proxy voting by investment advisers who use that proxy voting advice (availablehere).  The guidance, in the words of Commissioner Elad L. Roisman, “reiterate[s] longstanding Commission rules and positions that remain applicable and very relevant in today’s marketplace."

Read More

Desktop Calendar of SEC Deadlines for 2020 Now Available

August 21, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell; James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​This is a smart time of year to confirm plans for SEC reporting and capital markets transactions in 2020. To assist public companies in keeping track of the various filing deadlines, we have prepared a desktop reference calendar that sets forth filing deadlines for many SEC reports. To assist companies with planning capital markets transactions, including IPOs, our calendar also provides the staleness dates (i.e., the last date financial statements may be used in a prospectus or proxy statement without being updated).

Read More

SEC Proposes to Modernize Disclosures of Business, Legal Proceedings, and Risk Factors

August 12, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

​On August 8, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") announced that it voted to propose amendments to Regulation S-K (available here) seeking to modernize and simplify the required disclosures by public companies, investment advisors, and investment companies (the “Proposed Amendments").  The Proposed Amendments form part of the SEC’s ongoing efforts to simplify disclosure requirements, and, with the exception of Legal Proceedings, emphasize a more flexible, principles-based approach as opposed to prescriptive requirements.  “The world economy and our markets have changed dramatically in the more than 30 years since the adoption of our rules for business disclosures by public companies.  Today’s proposal reflects these significant changes, as well as the reality that there will be changes in the future," said Chairman Jay Clayton.  “I applaud the staff for their efforts to modernize and improve our disclosure framework, including recognizing that intangible assets, and in particular human capital, often are a significantly more important driver of value in today’s global economy.  The proposals reflect a thoughtful mix of prescriptive and principles-based requirements that should result in improved disclosures and the elimination of unnecessary costs and burdens."

Read More

Reporting Companies Are Strongly Encouraged to Review SEC Statement On LIBOR Transition

July 17, 2019 | Posted by Michael A. Titera; Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On July 12, 2019, the Division of Corporation Finance, Division of Investment Management, Division of Trading and Markets, and Office of the Chief Accountant of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff") issued a joint statement (the “Statement") (available here) regarding the expected discontinuation of LIBOR and transition to alternative reference rates.  The Statement reminds readers that the discontinuation of LIBOR could have a significant impact on financial markets and may present a material risk for market participants, including public companies, investment advisers, investment companies, and broker-dealers.  The Statement encourages market participants to proactively manage their transition away from LIBOR and outlines several areas that may warrant increased attention.  As noted by the Staff, “[f]or many market participants, waiting until all open questions have been answered to begin this important work likely could prove to be too late to accomplish the challenging task required."  We encourage anyone who may be impacted by the LIBOR transition to review the Statement, which outlines ways market participants can think through potential transition risks and provides helpful guidance on related disclosure obligations and risk management efforts. 

Read More

SEC to Host Roundtable on Short-Termism on July 18

July 12, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Brian J. Lane; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

​The Securities and Exchange Commission has announced (available here) that it will hold a roundtable on July 18, 2019, to hear from investors, issuers and other market participants about short-termism’s impact on capital markets and whether the reporting system or other SEC regulations should be changed to address those concerns. The event will begin at 12:30 p.m. ET in the SEC’s headquarters and be open to the public in person and via live webcast on SEC.gov, as well as archived for later viewing. The agenda and access information are available here. The roundtable is related to a request for comment that the SEC published in December 2018, when the SEC announced it may be reconsidering quarterly reporting (our post about that SEC request for comment on quarterly reporting is available here). 

Read More

SEC Seeks to Simplify and Harmonize Private Offering Exemptions

June 24, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On June 18, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a concept release (available here) announcing that it isseeking comment on “possible ways to simplify, harmonize, and improve the exempt offering framework to promote capital formation and expand investment opportunities while maintaining appropriate investor protections.”

Read More

SEC Streamlines Procedure for Confidential Treatment Extensions

April 17, 2019 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On April 16, 2019, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division") of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") announced streamlined procedures for confidential treatment extensions for material contracts where the Division has previously granted confidential treatment (available here). These procedures were announced in light of the recently adopted redacted exhibit rules that permit registrants to redact confidential information from certain exhibits without filing a confidential treatment request (for more on the redacted exhibit rules, see our related prior client alert and blog post). Under the SEC’s rules, a registrant that has previously obtained a confidential treatment order for a material contract must file an extension application under Securities Act Rule 406 or Exchange Act Rule 24b-2 to continue to protect such confidential information from public release prior to the expiration of the existing order. Of note, a registrant cannot use the SEC’s recently adopted redacted exhibit rules to refile a redacted material contract that was granted confidential treatment under the old rules, but instead must rely on the confidential treatment extension process.

Read More

SEC Issues Guidance Relating to New Rules and Procedures for Redacting Confidential Information

April 3, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Corporate Governance; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On April 1, 2019, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued guidance relating to the recently adopted rules and procedures that permit registrants to redact confidential information from certain exhibits without filing a confidential treatment request (available here).  The guidance provides additional information on the Division’s process for reviewing redacted information and certain matters relating to the transition to the new rules and procedures. 

Read More

SEC Continues to Modernize and Simplify Disclosure Requirements

March 27, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On March 20, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted amendments (available here) to modernize and simplify disclosure requirements for public companies, investment advisors, and investment companies (the Final Rules). The Final Rules form part of the SEC’s ongoing efforts to simplify disclosure requirements. The Final Rules are largely consistent with the proposed amendments outlined in the SEC’s October 11, 2017 proposing release (available here, and discussed in our client alert available here).

Read More

SEC Expands Regulation A to Allow Offerings by Reporting Companies

January 7, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On December 19, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") adopted amendments to Regulation A allowing U.S. and Canadian companies that file reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act"), to conduct securities offerings using Regulation A.  The amendments were mandated by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law in May 2018.  

Read More

SEC Streamlines Disclosure Requirements as Part of its Overall Disclosure Effectiveness Review

August 27, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On August 17, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission") adopted several dozen amendments (available here) to “simplify compliance without significantly altering the total mix of information" (the “Final Rules").  In Release No. 33-10532, the Commission characterized the amended requirements as redundant, duplicative, overlapping, outdated or superseded, in light of subsequent changes to Commission disclosure requirements, U.S. GAAP, IFRS and technology developments.  

Read More

SEC Modifies XBRL Filing Requirements

August 17, 2018 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens; Michael A. Titera Topic(s): Securities Regulation

​On June 28, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") adopted a final rule, Inline XBRL Filing of Tagged Data, which substantially alters requirements related to the use of the eXentsible Business Reporting Language (“XBRL") format in operating companies’ financial statement information and funds’[1] risk/return summary information. The rule was published in the Federal Register on August 16, 2018, available here, and will be effective on September 17, 2018.

Read More

SEC Amends “Smaller Reporting Company” Definition to Expand Access to Scaled Disclosure Accommodations

July 6, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

​On June 28, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") approved amendments to the definition of a “smaller reporting company" (a “SRC").  These amendments will expand the number of registrants qualifying for SRC scaled disclosure accommodations in their SEC filings.  These scaled disclosure accommodations include, among other things, reduced required business, financial and executive compensation disclosures.  A chart  briefly summarizing the SRC disclosure accommodations is attached as Exhibit A.

Read More

The SEC Continues to Modernize and Adapt to the Times

June 12, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​The Securities and Exchange Commission (“the Commission”) recently adopted two rule amendments in its latest effort to synchronize Commission policies with the rapidly developing digital age.

Read More

The SEC’s Proposed Transaction Fee Pilot for US Equity Securities

June 8, 2018 | Posted by Lori Zyskowski; Brian J. Lane; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​In March 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a proposed rule, Rule 610T of Regulation NMS (the “Proposal”), which would create a Transaction Fee Pilot for National Market System (“NMS”) stocks (the “Pilot”).  The Pilot recently received renewed attention as a result of an email sent by the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) to listed issuers expressing concerns the NYSE has regarding the Pilot.

Read More

Strengthening U.S. Public Capital Markets – Recommendations from SIFMA Report

May 11, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Elizabeth A. Ising; Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On April 27, 2018, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”), the leading industry group representing broker-dealers, banks and asset managers, along with other securities industry related groups, released a report called “Expanding the On-Ramp: Recommendations to Help More Companies Go and Stay Public” (the “Report”).  In response to the decline in the number of IPOs and the number of public companies generally in the United States over the last twenty years, the Report provides recommendations aimed at reducing perceived impediments to becoming and remaining a public company. As the Report notes, the United States is now home to only about half the number of public companies that existed 20 years ago.  This decline is believed to have had adverse repercussions for the American economy generally, and the jobs market specifically.  In addition, the growth of private capital markets at the expense of public capital markets has raised concerns that individual investors are being marginalized.  More specifically, as many of the most innovative companies in the U.S. stay private longer and raise significant amounts of capital privately, the returns generated by such companies appear to accrue disproportionally to institutional, high net worth and other similar investors.

Read More

SEC Expands Prior Guidance on Non-GAAP Financial Forecasts in the M&A Context

April 11, 2018 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Tull Florey Topic(s): Securities Regulation

As discussed in our October 17, 2017 post, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) addressed an open question as to whether the disclosure of forecasted financial measures used in connection with a business combination transaction is subject to Item 10(e) of Regulation S-K and Regulation G.

Read More

Going Public Without an IPO: New NYSE Rules that Expand Options for Direct Listings Create Opportunity and Raise Questions

February 13, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

On February 2, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission approved a change to the New York Stock Exchange’s (Exchange) listing rules that permit companies to use “direct listings” to list their shares on the Exchange based on having a minimum independent valuation of $250 million and without having completed an underwritten initial public offering (IPO) or having their shares first traded on a private market.  Direct listing will continue to be at the NYSE’s discretion and require that the company have an effective resale registration statement on file with the SEC for at least some amount of its outstanding shares. Direct listings provide an option by which private companies can accomplish three goals without requiring an IPO: (a) make their shares a more attractive currency for merger and acquisition activity, (b) provide greater liquidity for existing shareholders, and (c) increase the value of their shares and employee stock options. The SEC approval comes in the wake of recent commentary by SEC Chairman Jay Clayton that he believes more IPOs are needed, noting they are generally beneficial to the retail investor community to the extent they provide investors with more investment alternatives, more opportunities to invest, and greater liquidity.

Read More

Federal Court Rejects Section 16(b) “Short-Swing Profits” Claim Challenging Share Withholding To Satisfy Taxes

January 26, 2018 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

A federal court in Oklahoma today issued a precedent-setting decision in favor of Gibson Dunn client WPX Energy, Inc., in Olagues v. Muncrief, No. 17-cv-153 (N.D. Okla. Jan. 26, 2018), ECF No. 42.  In the decision, the court held that pre-approved tax withholding dispositions made in connection with the vesting of equity grants are exempt from Section 16(b)’s prohibition on short-swing profits under Exchange Act Rule 16b-3(e)—even when an employee otherwise subject to the short-swing trading restrictions purchased the company’s shares during the six-month period preceding or following the tax withholding disposition.  This is the first time that a federal court has substantively addressed these types of short-swing trading claims, which have been serially raised by a small group of investors—first in the form of litigation demands and then, absent a payout to the investors, in litigation—during the last sixteen months.  A number of companies have refused the investors’ settlement demands, which has resulted in Section 16(b) cases against the companies’ executives in federal courts in California, Colorado, Delaware, Florida, Massachusetts, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Tennessee, Texas, and Washington state. 

Read More

Potential SEC Shutdown Coming – Where to Call Should the Lights Go Out

January 19, 2018 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Corporate Governance

This morning the SEC posted an update regarding the potential for a government shut-down in the days and weeks ahead providing information on the Commission’s operating plan during any such shut-down.  The post indicates the Commission will remain open for a few days into any government shut-down.  While this news provides a glimmer of hope that registrants with ’33 Act filings in progress, or urgent questions on interpretive matters can obtain some guidance from the Staff, the assistance may be short-lived.  Should the SEC eventually shut-down, a list of phone numbers for emergency personnel is provided via the link in the SEC’s posting below.

Read More

Technical Points To Remember When Preparing Your Form 10-K

January 12, 2018 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

With all of the substantive issues impacting disclosures in companies’ upcoming annual reports, there are a few technical points reporting companies should bear in mind when preparing their annual report.  Note that some of these issues are easy to miss given that they are not yet reflected in the official PDF of Form 10-K.

Read More

Corp Fin Clarifies Non-GAAP Guidance in the Business Combination Context

October 18, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

On October 17, 2017, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) issued one new Compliance & Disclosure Interpretation (“C&DI”) and revised an existing C&DI addressing the disclosure of forward-looking financial measures in the business combination context.  These two C&DIs seek to clarify the Staff’s position as to when:

Read More

Major Indices Move to Curb Multiple Class Structures

August 8, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Multiple class share structures have come under increasing scrutiny since Snap Inc. (“Snap”) offered exclusively non-voting shares in its March 1, 2017, initial public offering (“IPO”).  Companies employing the multiple-class structure argue that the structure contributes to corporate stability and long-term returns for shareholders, and aides in the revival of the sluggish IPO market by helping issuers overcome a reluctance to go public in the face of activist investors. However, citing corporate governance concerns and following considerable pressure and lobbying from institutional investors, both the FTSE Russell and Standard & Poor (“S&P”) Dow Jones have recently taken measures that may be seen as discouraging the practice.

Read More

Delaware Approves Use of Blockchain in New DGCL Amendments

July 31, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney; J. Alan Bannister Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On July 21, 2017, Delaware Governor John C. Carney Jr. signed into law, effective August 1, 2017, Senate Bill 69 (“SB 69”), amending Delaware’s General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) to, among other things, allow corporations to utilize electronic databases and blockchain technology to maintain and distribute certain corporate records. The passage of SB 69 further solidifies Delaware’s position as the leader in corporate regulatory innovation by demonstrating the state’s readiness to embrace new and innovative technologies being utilized by the corporate market.

Read More

SEC Warns that Securities Laws May Apply to Initial Coin Offerings and Other Digital Currency Sales

July 26, 2017 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; J. Alan Bannister Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On Tuesday, July 25, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a Report of Investigation (the “Report”) finding for the first time that an offer and sale of virtual currency, often called an Initial Coin Offering (abbreviated “ICO”) or “Token Sale”, can be subject to U.S. federal securities laws. While the SEC decided not to pursue an enforcement action in this particular instance, the SEC did find that that the ICO that was the subject of the Report involved an offering of securities subject to U.S. federal securities laws.

Read More

SEC Chairman Jay Clayton Delivers First Public Remarks Since Confirmation

July 13, 2017 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

In his first public speech since being confirmed as Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”), Jay Clayton addressed the Economic Club of New York on July 12, 2017.  In his remarks, available here, Chairman Clayton discussed his vision of the principles that should guide the Commission and opportunities to apply those principles in practice.

Read More

SEC Economist Comments on New Technologies Used by the Commission to Identify Risk, Detect Fraud and Enforce the Securities Laws

June 30, 2017 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Last week Scott Bauguess, Acting Director and Acting Chief Economist of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Economic Risk and Analysis, shared insights about how the SEC is leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to track, and perhaps predict, emerging risks in the marketplace.[1]  In the latest in a series of speeches,[2] Bauguess also described how the SEC is using big data, harnessed with the appropriate processing power and partnered with human intuition, to focus investigative and enforcement resources.  While Bauguess and others at the SEC see a bright future for data analytics at the SEC, particularly in identifying emerging trends, Bauguess stressed the human element is ever important in assessing risk, combatting fraud and bringing or recommending enforcement actions.

Read More

SEC Significantly Expands Confidential Review of Registration Statements

June 30, 2017 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Andrew L. Fabens; Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Miscellaneous

Will Allow Confidential Submission of All Registration Statements for IPOs, Spin-Offs and Most Offerings Within 12 Months of an IPO or Spin-Off The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced[1] on Thursday that its the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) will soon allow all companies to submit initial public offering (“IPO”) draft registration statements for confidential review. This change expands a benefit previously reserved for Emerging Growth Companies (“EGCs”), and is specifically aimed at encouraging more companies to enter the public market.  The SEC also announced that it will review draft registration statements submitted by non EGCs that omit financial statements that the issuer reasonably believes will not be required when the registration statement is filed publicly, and indicated a willingness to discuss expedited reviews with issuers and their advisors. 

Read More

SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance Suspends Enforcement of Certain Conflicts Minerals Requirements

April 9, 2017 | Posted by Lori Zyskowski; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

It has been an eventful week for those following the conflict minerals rules in the news.  The United States District Court for the District of Columbia issued final judgment in the long-running conflicts minerals litigation (detailed here) and, following a statement by Acting Chairman Piwowar, the Division of Corporation Finance has issued a blanket statement that it will not recommend enforcement of some of the most burdensome requirements of the rules (available here).

Read More

SEC Adopts Amendment Shortening Trade Settlement Cycle From T+3 to T+2 (potential implications)

March 25, 2017 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

The SEC has adopted an amendment to Rule 15c6-1(a) of the Exchange Act (the Settlement Cycle Rule) shortening the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions from three business days after the trade date (“T+3”) to two business days after the trade date (“T+2”).  The compliance date for the amendment is September 5, 2017.  The new requirement will prohibit broker-dealers from effecting or entering into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security (other than exempted securities, government securities, municipal securities, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, and commercial bills) that provides for payment of funds and delivery of securities later than the second business day after the date of the contract, unless otherwise expressly agreed to by the parties at the time of the transaction.

Read More

Non-Voting Shares Make Their Public Debut and Generate Some Governance Concerns, but How Will Courts View the Structure When First Presented?

March 12, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

On March 1, 2017, Snap Inc. (“Snap” or the “Company”) – owner of the popular social media platform Snapchat – priced its highly anticipated initial public offering (“IPO”). With 200 million shares sold at $17 per share, the IPO raised approximately $3.4 billion for the Company. On their first trading day, Snap shares opened at $22.41 per share and peaked as high as $28.84 the following day. As of March 10, shares closed at $22.07, above its initial offering price, but below its opening trading price. As the largest IPO of any U.S.-based company since Facebook’s public offering in 2012, many investors’ primary focus here has been on the complete lack of voting privileges associated with the shares sold in the IPO. 

Read More

SEC Brings Enforcement Action for Deficient Disclosure of Financial Advisors’ Fee Arrangements

February 17, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On February 14, 2017, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced the settlement of an enforcement action against CVR Energy, Inc. (“CVR” or the “Company”).  The SEC brought action against the Company for its failure to disclose adequately the material terms of its fee arrangements with two investment banks in connection with the financial advisory services each bank provided to CVR during the pendency of a hostile tender offer launched by an activist.  See CVR Energy, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 80039 (February 14, 2017).

Read More

Acting SEC Chair Piwowar Directs Staff to Reconsider Conflict Minerals Rule

February 1, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On January 31, 2017, the SEC’s Acting Chairman, Michael Piwowar, issued a public statement (available here) that he has directed the Commission’s Staff to reconsider whether the Staff’s prior guidance on conflict minerals disclosures (previously published in April 2014 and available here) is still appropriate and evaluate whether additional relief may be appropriate. 

Read More

OM&A Staff Publishes Updated Guidance on Tender Offers

November 20, 2016 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On Friday, November 18, 2016, the Staff in the Office of Mergers & Acquisitions (“OM&A”) in the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) at the Securities and Exchange Commission released several new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) addressing:

Read More

Shareholder Nominates First Proxy Access Nominee

November 10, 2016 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller; Lori Zyskowski; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Proxy Access

In what appears to be the first use of a company’s proxy access bylaw, GAMCO Asset Management filed today a Schedule 13D/A (available here ) and a Schedule 14N (available here ) announcing that it has used the proxy access bylaw at National Fuel Gas (NFG) to nominate a director candidate for election at NFG’s 2017 Annual Meeting.  According to the 13D/A, GAMCO and its affiliates beneficially own in the aggregate approximately 7.81% of NFG’s Common Stock and yesterday delivered a letter to NFG nominating Lance A. Bakrow to the Board of Directors.  NFG described itself in its most recent Form 10-K as “a diversified energy company engaged principally in the production, gathering, transportation, distribution and marketing of natural gas.”  According to the Schedule 13D/A, Mr. Bakrow is the “co-founder and a director of Greenwich Energy Solutions, a private company that provides independent energy solutions in the northeastern United States.” NFG’s Proxy Access Bylaw

Read More

SEC Eliminates Need for Affirmative “Tandy” Representations from Issuers

October 5, 2016 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On October 5, 2016, the Staff in the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) announced that it will no longer require companies to make so-called Tandy representations in their filing review correspondence. 

Read More

Schedule 13G “Passive” Investor Status – When Being A Little Active Is Still Passive!

July 16, 2016 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Robert B. Little; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation; Shareholder Proposals

On Thursday, July 14, 2016, the Staff in the Division of Corporation Finance posted a new C&DI on Section 13(d) that provides stockholders (and issuers) with some helpful insights, and perhaps greater clarity, on when significant stockholders can engage in a dialogue with management and still remain on Schedule 13G.  As many practitioners know, Schedule 13G (the “short form” for reporting beneficial ownership of equity positions of 5% or more) often requires an affirmative certification from the reporting person(s) that the securities were not acquired, and are not held, with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing control of the issuer.   This is commonly referred to as the “passive” investor certification which is set forth at the end of Schedule 13G, directly above the signature line. 

Read More

When the Tail Wags the Unicorn: SEC Chair Voices Concerns About Pre-IPO Investments

April 11, 2016 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; JOBS Act; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 31, SEC Chair Mary Jo White gave a keynote address at Stanford University in which she discussed some of the SEC’s emerging priorities with respect to pre-IPO stage companies, private capital markets and fintech.  According to Chair White, the SEC is paying particular attention to the risks of fraud and investor confusion that can arise when companies choose to stay private longer. 

Read More

New SEC Staff Guidance on Describing Shareholder Proposals on Proxy Cards

March 23, 2016 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Lori Zyskowski; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On March 22, 2016, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Staff”) issued a new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretation (C&DI) regarding how Rule 14a-8 shareholder proposals should be described on issuer proxy cards in compliance with Rule 14a-4(a)(3) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.  This C&DI was issued in response to complaints the Staff received from shareholder proponents about the lack of specificity on some companies’ proxy cards.

Read More

One More Time! SEC Seeks to Re-Adopt Resource Extraction Disclosure Rules

December 13, 2015 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On December 11, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission voted to propose a new rule implementing Section 1504 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act.  That provision directs the SEC to promulgate rules requiring “resource extraction issuer[s]” (i.e., issuers that extract natural resources) to disclose payments they make to the U.S. government or foreign governments for the commercial development of oil, natural gas, or minerals.  The SEC’s latest action follows a ruling by a federal district court in Massachusetts directing the SEC to expedite its promulgation of a new rule implementing Section 1504. 

Read More

“FAST” Act Legislation Enacted — Potentially Significant Impact on Capital Markets

December 6, 2015 | Posted by Peter Wardle; Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed into law the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, known as the “FAST Act.”  This five-year transportation bill also includes a number of provisions related to securities laws and capital-raising measures. The key securities law provisions of the FAST Act are summarized as follows: Reforming Access for Investments in Startup Enterprises:

Read More

Corp Fin Issues New Guidance on Unbundling of Proposals

November 5, 2015 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens; Robyn Zolman Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

On October 27, 2015, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) issued two new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“CDIs”) regarding the “unbundling” of certain proposals under Rule 14a-4(a)(3) of the Exchange Act in the context of mergers, acquisitions, and similar transactions.  Federal proxy rules generally prohibit the grouping of separate matters into a single proposal submitted for shareholder approval.  The rules provide that companies must separately submit — or “unbundle” — proposals to allow shareholders to vote on each matter.  In connection with business combination transactions, acquiring companies have at times attempted to bundle several amendments to their organizational documents with the business combination when seeking shareholder approval of the transaction.  The new CDIs clarify the Staff’s position with respect to this circumstance, requiring separate votes for the transaction and for any material amendment to the acquiror’s organizational documents.  The new CDIs are available here.

Read More

SEC Adopts Final Crowdfunding Rules

November 2, 2015 | Posted by Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On October 30, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) voted to adopt final rules permitting companies to offer and sell securities through crowdfunding.  The new rules, a response to evolving methods of online fundraising for a variety of firms and projects, are meant to assist smaller companies with capital formation and provide additional protections to investors. We previously discussed the proposed crowdfunding rules here; the text of the final rules has not yet been issued, but a copy of the proposed rules is available here.

Read More

ISS Opens Comment Period for Draft 2016 Proxy Voting Policy Updates

October 26, 2015 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski; Ronald O. Mueller; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Say on Pay; Securities Regulation

Today Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) proposed for comment three changes to its 2016 U.S. proxy voting policies.  Comments on the proposed changes can be submitted via e‑mail to [email protected] by 6 p.m. ET on November 9, 2015.  ISS will take the comments into account as part of its policy review and expects to release its final 2016 U.S. policy updates on November 18, 2015.  We note that ISS’s final 2016 proxy voting policies, which will apply to shareholder meetings held on or after February 1, 2016, likely will reflect additional changes beyond these on which ISS has solicited comments. 

Read More

Massachusetts District Court Orders the SEC to Issue Final Resource Extraction Rule

September 4, 2015 | Posted by Brian J. Lane; Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On September 2, 2015, following a briefing by Oxfam America, Inc. (“Oxfam”) and the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”), the U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts granted Oxfam’s motion for summary judgment and ordered the SEC to file with the Court within 30 days “an expedited schedule for promulgating the final [resource extraction] rule.

Read More

D.C. Circuit Issues Conflict Minerals Decision, but Uncertainty Remains

August 21, 2015 | Posted by Lori Zyskowski; James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On August 18, 2015, following a panel rehearing, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued an opinion affirming its April 2014 decision in National Association of Manufacturers, et al. v. SEC, et al. (“NAM”) that the conflict minerals disclosure rule violates the First Amendment to the extent it requires companies to report that any of their products have “not been found to be ‘DRC conflict free.’”  The NAM panel had granted a petition for rehearing in light of a July 2014 ruling in American Meat Institute v. U.S. Department of Agriculture (“AMI”), in which an en banc panel of the D.C. Circuit upheld the constitutionality of compelled speech in the form of Department of Agriculture rules requiring country-of-origin labeling for meat products and raised issues regarding the standard of review to be applied by the court in reviewing the First Amendment challenge in NAM.  Because the opinion also addressed the appropriate standard of review to be applied by courts in reviewing compelled speech in the regulatory arena, the NAM panel saw fit to reconsider its decision in light of AMI.

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules On “Pay Versus Performance” Disclosures

April 30, 2015 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation; Say on Pay

To Our Clients and Friends:

On April 29, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC" or "Commission") voted, 3-2, to issue proposed rules implementing the pay-versus-performance disclosure requirement in Section 953(a) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the "Dodd-Frank Act").  In summary, the proposed rules would require proxy statements or information statements setting forth executive compensation disclosure to include (1) a new compensation table setting forth for each of the five most recently completed fiscal years, the "executive compensation actually paid" (as defined in the proposed rules), total compensation as disclosed in the Summary Compensation Table, total shareholder return (TSR), and peer group TSR, and (2) based on the information set forth in the new table, a clear description of the relationship between executive compensation actually paid to the company’s named executive officers and the company’s TSR, and a comparison of the company’s TSR and the TSR of a peer group chosen by the company.

Read More

Another SEC Sweep? – More Enforcement Actions for Failure to Update 13D Disclosures – This Time In Connection With Going Private Transactions

March 20, 2015 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Securities Regulation

Last Friday, the SEC announced that it had settled a string of 21C administrative proceedings brought against eight officers, directors, and shareholders of public companies for their failure to report plans and actions leading up to planned going private transactions. The SEC press release can be found here. In doing so, the SEC sent another strong reminder to those that beneficially own more than 5% of the equity securities of a public company to keep their 13D disclosures current.

Read More

SEC Grants No-Action Letter Allowing for 5-Business Day Debt Tender Offers

January 23, 2015 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Securities Regulation

Today, January 23, 2015, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) granted a no-action letter that was submitted on behalf of a consortium of law firms, including Gibson Dunn, whereby the Staff agreed to not recommend Enforcement action when a debt tender offer is held open for as short as 5 business days. This letter builds upon an evolving line of no-action letters granted over the past three decades that have addressed not only the overall duration of debt tender offers (typically the rules require a minimum of 20 business days), but also formula pricing mechanisms (that allow a final price to be announced several days prior to expiration). Following an extensive dialogue with members of the bar and numerous market participants, including issuers, investment banks and institutional investors that began several years ago, the Staff is now opening up the relief that it previously limited to “investment grade” debt securities. Under the no-action letter, “non-investment” grade debt securities are now eligible to be purchased on an expedited basis. In order to take full advantage of this relief, issuers will need to disseminate their offers in a widespread manner and on an immediate basis. This should enable more security holders to quickly learn about the offer and permit holders to receive the tender consideration in a shorter timeframe. In addition, the abbreviated offering period will allow more issuers to better price their tender offers with less risk posed by fluctuating interest rates and other timing and market concerns related to the offer.

Read More

House Financial Services Committee Approves Eight Bills Affecting Securities Regulation

July 16, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; JOBS Act; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

Earlier this summer, on May 22, 2014, the Financial Services Committee of the House of Representatives approved eight bills relating to issuer disclosures, public and private capital raising, the liquidity of restricted securities and SEC regulations generally.  These bills, if enacted into law, would incrementally ease the many burdens imposed by the current securities regulatory regime.

Read More

SEC Issues Guidance on the Use of Social Media and the Intrastate Offering Exemption

June 11, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Solicitations using Social Media

During a webcast earlier this year, our partner Jim Moloney, who formerly worked in the SEC’s Office of Mergers & Acquisitions (“OM&A”), spoke with the current Chief of OM&A, Michele Anderson.  On that webcast, Ms. Anderson acknowledged that “social media is here to stay,” noting that the Commission was “trying to find a way to make it work.”  Following the webcast, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (“Corp Fin”) posted a new round of Securities Act Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) that approved hyperlinking to legends or required statements in satisfaction of the requirements of Rules 134, 165 and 433 in certain situations.  Under three new interpretations, Corp Fin clarified that an electronic communication containing a hyperlink to a legend (or a required statement in the Rule 134 context) would be acceptable so long as: 

Read More

The Council of Institutional Investors Presses SEC Staff for Guidance on Interim Vote Tallies

April 7, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Last May, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the provider of proxy services for over 90% of public companies and mutual funds in North America (“Broadridge”), decided to end its established practice of providing interim vote tallies (sometimes referred to as “preliminary voting results”) to proponents of shareholder proposals.  Following this change in practice, the Council of Institutional Investors (“CII”) sent a letter to the SEC asking the Commission to reverse Broadridge’s change in practice.  Later in July, Broadridge reviewed its decision, promising to “continue to monitor developments on th[e] issue” and noting that it is contractually obligated to follow client directions regarding release of interim vote tallies. 

Read More

SEC Issues Second Set of FAQs on Conflict Minerals Rules

April 7, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On April 7, 2014 the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a second set of Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) on its conflict minerals rules (Exchange Act Section 13(p), Rule 13p-1 and Item 1.01 of Form SD).  The full set of FAQs, including the nine new FAQs and the 12 FAQs issued in May 2013, is available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/conflictminerals-faq.htm.  For more information about the conflict minerals rules, please see our client alert available at https://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/pages/ConflictMinerals-UnderstandingFinalSECRules.aspx, and for a discussion of the first set of FAQs, please see our client alert available at https://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/pages/SEC-Issues-FAQs-On-Conflict-Minerals.aspx.

Read More

Corp Fin Issues Revised Statement on WKSI Waivers

March 26, 2014 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 12, 2014, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued a Revised Statement on Well-Known Seasoned Issuer Waivers (the Revised Statement). 

Read More

U.S. Court of Appeals Hears Argument on SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rules

January 8, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a suit challenging the SEC’s conflict minerals rules, which were mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act and issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012.  The case came to the D.C. Circuit on appeal from a July 2013 district court decision upholding the SEC’s rules.  The rules had been challenged by the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable (the “Appellants”).

Read More

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.