• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

New Considerations for Reporting Beneficial Ownership by The Vanguard Group in Company Proxy Statements

March 30, 2026 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski; Aaron K. Briggs Topic(s): Disclosure; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

In June 2025, The Vanguard Group, Inc. (“VGI”) announced plans to establish two wholly owned U.S. investment advisors, Vanguard Capital Management (“VCM”) and Vanguard Portfolio Management (“VPM”), each of which consists of distinct investment management teams and investment stewardship teams to manage various funds. In early January, Vanguard announced that it had completed this internal realignment.

Over the past week, Vanguard has filed over a thousand Schedule 13G amendments reporting that VGI is no longer treated as the beneficial owner of any of the portfolio company shares held by the various funds that are now managed by VCM and VPM. Companies that are in the throes of finalizing their proxy statements should check whether VGI made such a filing with respect to their stock.

While VCM and/or VPM may file new Schedule 13Gs reporting their beneficial ownership of some portfolio companies’ stock before those companies finalize their proxy statement, any such new Schedule 13G filings may not be due until May 15, 2026, and companies have no certainty as to whether the new ownership reports will be filed earlier. In the meantime, Vanguard has voluntarily provided an Illustrative Beneficial Ownership report to assist market participants with understanding how beneficial ownership of portfolio company securities might have been attributed to VCM and VPM had the internal realignment occurred on or immediately prior to December 31, 2025. However, VGI states that this information is derived from VGI’s publicly available data as of December 31, 2025, including VGI’s Form 13F filings, and notes that the information does not replace or modify any official beneficial ownership information previously filed with the SEC. Moreover, in Corporation Finance Interpretation 229.02 under Regulation S-K, the SEC Staff advised companies not to rely on Schedule 13F filings when reporting beneficial ownership under Item 403(a) of Regulation S-K.

This situation has presented a minor quandary for companies over whether and how to report Vanguard beneficial ownership in their proxy statements’ beneficial ownership table when they have learned of the Schedule 13G reporting no beneficial ownership by VGI, but neither VCM nor VPM has filed a Schedule 13G reporting their beneficial ownership of the company’s securities.  On the one hand, companies may not timely know VCM’s and VPM’s beneficial ownership; on the other hand, companies also may be hesitant to completely omit a potentially significant share ownership position from the beneficial ownership table.

We believe there are a number of reasonable approaches to this situation. The proxy rules and Item 403 of Regulation S-K only require companies to report beneficial ownership of greater than 5% beneficial owners to the extent known by the Company “as of the most recent practicable date.” Moreover, as a result of amendments to the Schedule 13D/G reporting rules that went into effect in September 2024, beneficial ownership reporting is often based on out-of-date information and is only approximately correct, as addressed in our prior discussion set forth here. Companies that had already finalized their definitive proxy statements prior to VGI’s most recent Schedule 13G filing generally will not need to update their disclosures.

For companies that have not finalized their proxy statements, we believe one reasonable approach would be to (1) report the beneficial ownership indicated in the prior (not the most recent) Schedule 13G filed by VGI, particularly if the most recent VGI beneficial ownership filing occurred after the date that the company uses for its beneficial ownership table, and (2) state in a footnote to the beneficial ownership table that shares previously beneficially owned by VGI may now be owned by subsidiaries or divisions of VGI.

  • Based on language in the most recent VGI Schedule 13G filings, that footnote disclosure could read as follows: “The Vanguard Group subsequently reported that due to an internal realignment it no longer has, or is deemed to have, beneficial ownership over Company securities beneficially owned by various Vanguard subsidiaries and/or business divisions.”
  • In order to track other language in the VGI Schedule 13G filings reiterating that other VGI subsidiaries or divisions may now own company shares, the footnote might also state: “The Vanguard Group also reported that certain subsidiaries or business divisions that formerly had, or were deemed to have, beneficial ownership with The Vanguard Group, will report beneficial ownership separately (on a disaggregated basis).”

More generally, companies should carefully review the language that precedes their beneficial ownership table to make sure that it has an appropriate “knowledge” qualification, and that it accurately describes the date(s) as of which beneficial ownership is being reported.

EDGAR Access Delays and Conditional No-Action Relief for Section 16(a) Filers

March 13, 2026 | Posted by Mellissa Campbell Duru; Eric Scarazzo; Marie M. Kwon; Rodrigo Surcan Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

On March 12, 2026, the Staff provided domestic and first-time foreign private issuer Section 16 filers with conditional no-action relief. If Section 16(a) filings cannot be timely made by the March 18, 2026 deadline under the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act due to delays in obtaining EDGAR access, filings can be made by April 1, 2026, provided certain conditions are met.  Reproduced below are the updated FAQs.

Read More

Attention: March 18, 2026 Section 16(a) Reporting for Foreign Private Issuers’ Directors and Officers and Clarifications on Who is Exempt

March 9, 2026 | Posted by Mellissa Campbell Duru; Eric Scarazzo; Marie M. Kwon; Rodrigo Surcan Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

On March 5, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) granted exemptive relief from the upcoming March 18, 2026 Section 16(a) reporting deadline applicable to directors and officers of foreign private issuers (FPIs) organized in a “qualifying jurisdiction,” who are subject to a “qualifying regulation[1]”. See our client alert for more details.

Read More

Update: Foreign Private Issuer Director & Officer Section 16 Reporting Starts March 18, 2026

March 2, 2026 | Posted by Eric Scarazzo; Mellissa Campbell Duru; Rodrigo Surcan; Marie M. Kwon Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

On February 27, 2026, the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) adopted final rules and form amendments implementing the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (the HFIAA).  The HFIAA, signed into law on December 18, 2025 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2026, amended Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) to extend insider reporting obligations to directors and officers of foreign private issuers (FPIs).  Historically, such individuals were exempt from Section 16 reporting.  See our prior blog post here for additional background.

Read More

The End of (Most) PX14A6G Filings and Other New Proxy/Executive Compensation Interpretations

January 26, 2026 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Gina Hancock; Julia Lapitskaya; Krista P. Hanvey; Mellissa Campbell Duru; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Disclosure; Executive Compensation; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Shareholder Proposals

On January 23, 2026, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission issued several new and updated Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”). The new C&DIs include guidance related to proxy rules and executive compensation disclosures.  Other C&DIs issued the same day address additional matters under the proxy rules, tender offer rules and schedules, and Securities Act matters, which we address in this Client Alert.

Read More

Updated Summary of Director Education Opportunities Now Available

January 15, 2026 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Lori Zyskowski; Ronald O. Mueller; Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; ESG; IPOs; Securities Regulation; Shareholder Proposals

Gibson Dunn’s summary of director education opportunities has been updated as of January 2026. A copy is available at this link. Boards of Directors of public and private companies find this a useful resource as they look for high quality education opportunities.

This quarter’s update to the summary of director education opportunities includes a number of new opportunities as well as updates to the programs offered by organizations that have been included in our prior updates.

Read More

Section 16 Insider Reporting Requirements Extended to Foreign Private Issuers Directors and Officers

December 24, 2025 | Posted by Mellissa Campbell Duru; Eric Scarazzo Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

Tucked within the National Defense Authorization Act of Fiscal Year 2026 (the NDAA) are the provisions of the Holding Foreign Insiders Accountable Act (the HFIAA).  The HFIAA was signed into law on December 18, 2025 and amends Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act) to extend Section 16(a) reporting obligations to the directors and officers of foreign private issuers (FPIs).  Prior to its enactment, directors and officers of FPIs were exempt from such reporting requirements.

Read More

EDGAR Closed December 24, 2025 Through December 26, 2025

December 22, 2025 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; Miscellaneous; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

On December 22, 2025, the SEC announced that the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval (EDGAR) system will be closed from Wednesday, December 24, 2025 through Friday, December 26, 2025, in observance of the federal holiday. During this time, EDGAR filing websites will not be operational, SEC filings will not be accepted on EDGAR, and EDGAR Filer Support will be closed.

EDGAR operations will resume on Monday, December 29, 2025. The announcement also explained that any SEC filings due on December 24, December 25, or December 26, 2025 will be considered timely if filed on December 29, 2025, EDGAR’s next operational business day.

California Announces It Will Not Enforce Climate-Related Risk Reporting Law (SB 261)

December 2, 2025 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Julia Lapitskaya; Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes Topic(s): Disclosure; Environmental/Climate Change; ESG

As previously reported, California’s SB 261 would have required U.S. companies (public and private), other than insurers, with more than $500 million in annual revenue that do business in California to publish their first climate-related financial risk report on or before January 1, 2026. See California’s Health and Safety Code Section 38533 (as adopted by Senate Bill 261 and subsequently amended).

This is no longer the case:

  • On November 18, 2025, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit enjoined the law pending an appeal by a coalition of leading business organizations challenging its constitutionality in the ongoing legal proceeding. The case is Chamber of Commerce of the United States et al. v. Sanchez et al., No. 25-5327 (9th Cir.).
  • On December 1, 2025, the California Air Resources Board (“CARB”), the state agency responsible for enforcing SB 261, responded to the injunction by posting an enforcement advisory stating it would not enforce the law “against covered entities for failing to post and submit reports by the January 1, 2026, statutory deadline.” Instead, CARB “will provide further information—including an alternate date for reporting, as appropriate—after the appeal is resolved.”

This advisory resolves any question as to whether the court’s injunction applied only to the parties to the case and their members by stating that all in-scope companies are no longer expected to publish a climate-related risk report by the original January 1, 2026 deadline. CARB has posted a docket and instructions for companies who nonetheless wish to voluntarily submit a report.

Read More

Post-Shutdown Guidance for Registration Statements: Stay the Course or Get in Line

November 14, 2025 | Posted by Atma Kabad; Hillary H. Holmes; Andrew L. Fabens; Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle; Jinhua Zhang Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

With the U.S. government reopening after a 43-day shutdown, the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) issued new Q&As on November 13, 2025 addressing certain post-shutdown issues, including the treatment of pending registration statements and proxy statements that were filed during the shutdown. Importantly, the guidance provides that:

  • Issuers that filed new or amended registration statements without a delaying amendment during the government shutdown do not need to file an amendment to their registration statements to add a delaying amendment. Those registration statements will still become effective automatically 20 days after the filing date under Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).
  • Issuers that filed new or amended registration statements without a delaying amendment during the government shutdown can still rely on Rule 430A, which provides a basis for companies to launch IPOs with a price range on the cover of their prospectus notwithstanding that the registration statement will become effective automatically.
  • If an issuer that filed a registration statement without a delaying amendment wishes to have the registration statement declared effective before the automatic 20-day period ends, it will need to file an amendment to its registration statement to include a delaying amendment and request acceleration under Rule 461.
  • For proxy statements and information statements, companies may proceed to file definitive materials once the 10-day waiting period has passed, even if the preliminary versions were filed during the government shutdown, except if the Division indicated that it would review the filing prior to the government shutdown.

The Division reminded issuers that the liability and anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws apply to registration statements that go effective automatically under Section 8(a), and that such issuers must ensure their filings do not contain material misstatements or omissions of material information required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. The Division also indicated that it would continue to review filings that were under review or which the Division indicated that it would review prior to the government shutdown in the order in which the filings were received.

The Division indicated that issuers filed over 900 registration statements during the shutdown and that the staff of the Division will review filings in the order in which they were received, suggesting that response times for comment letters, waivers and interpretive requests may initially take longer than usual until the backlog is cleared. Nevertheless, the guidance reflects the SEC’s intent not to impede IPOs and other securities offerings, allowing companies that filed during the shutdown to proceed under multiple paths.

Gibson Dunn’s lawyers are available to assist with any questions you may have regarding the SEC’s latest guidance and related compliance considerations under federal securities laws and regulations.

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 50
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean C. Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Atma Kabad

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Marie M. Kwon

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

Hank Michael

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Gerry Spedale

Rodrigo Surcan

Michael A. Titera

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Jinhua Zhang

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society for Corporate Governance
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • TheCorporateCounsel.net
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky Blog
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.