• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

PCAOB Public Meeting on Proposed Changes to the Auditor’s Reporting Model

April 9, 2014 | Posted by Michael Scanlon Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Last week, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (the “PCAOB”) convened a series of ten panels as part of a two-day public meeting regarding proposed changes to the auditor’s reporting model.  The proposed changes have elicited a range of opinions from various stakeholders and commentators, a majority of which have been critical of the proposals.  Individuals invited to appear as panelists at last week’s meeting, however, were generally supportive of the proposed changes and offered various recommendations for ways in which the PCAOB could modify its proposals in order to move forward. 

Read More

The Council of Institutional Investors Presses SEC Staff for Guidance on Interim Vote Tallies

April 7, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Last May, Broadridge Financial Solutions, Inc., the provider of proxy services for over 90% of public companies and mutual funds in North America (“Broadridge”), decided to end its established practice of providing interim vote tallies (sometimes referred to as “preliminary voting results”) to proponents of shareholder proposals.  Following this change in practice, the Council of Institutional Investors (“CII”) sent a letter to the SEC asking the Commission to reverse Broadridge’s change in practice.  Later in July, Broadridge reviewed its decision, promising to “continue to monitor developments on th[e] issue” and noting that it is contractually obligated to follow client directions regarding release of interim vote tallies. 

Read More

SEC Issues Second Set of FAQs on Conflict Minerals Rules

April 7, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On April 7, 2014 the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a second set of Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) on its conflict minerals rules (Exchange Act Section 13(p), Rule 13p-1 and Item 1.01 of Form SD).  The full set of FAQs, including the nine new FAQs and the 12 FAQs issued in May 2013, is available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/conflictminerals-faq.htm.  For more information about the conflict minerals rules, please see our client alert available at https://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/pages/ConflictMinerals-UnderstandingFinalSECRules.aspx, and for a discussion of the first set of FAQs, please see our client alert available at https://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/pages/SEC-Issues-FAQs-On-Conflict-Minerals.aspx.

Read More

Corp Fin Issues Revised Statement on WKSI Waivers

March 26, 2014 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 12, 2014, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued a Revised Statement on Well-Known Seasoned Issuer Waivers (the Revised Statement). 

Read More

ISS To Revise QuickScore

January 9, 2014 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation

On January 8, 2014, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) announced that it will launch a new version of QuickScore (“QuickScore 2.0”) on February 18, 2014.  QuickScore benchmarks a company’s governance risk against other companies in the Russell 3000 Index based on a number of weighted governance factors.  QuickScore 2.0 will use a different method to score companies’ governance risk and will automatically reflect changes in companies’ governance structures based on publicly disclosed information.    

    Read More

U.S. Court of Appeals Hears Argument on SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rules

January 8, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a suit challenging the SEC’s conflict minerals rules, which were mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act and issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012.  The case came to the D.C. Circuit on appeal from a July 2013 district court decision upholding the SEC’s rules.  The rules had been challenged by the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable (the “Appellants”).

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules to Implement “Regulation A-Plus” Exemption Under the JOBS Act

December 18, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed rules to implement a new exemption from registration for securities offerings made pursuant to Section 3(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), as mandated by Section 401 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act).  This new offering exemption is commonly referred to as “Regulation A-Plus.

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Issues “Bad Actor” Rule Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations

December 6, 2013 | Posted by Peter Wardle Topic(s): Dodd Frank; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On December 4, 2013, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) providing guidance on rules recently adopted by the SEC that prohibit certain felons and other “bad actors” from participating in private securities offerings that rely on Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act).  The rule generally applies to the issuer, certain third parties that participate in the offering, and certain controlling persons, officers and affiliates of the issuer and such third parties (covered persons).

Read More

NASDAQ Amends New Compensation Committee Independence Criteria to Provide Flexibility

December 3, 2013 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) has amended its new rules on compensation committee independence to provide additional flexibility for committee members to meet the independence criteria.  As a result of the amendment, NASDAQ rules will no longer prohibit a director from serving on a listed company’s compensation committee if the director receives fees from the company.  Instead, boards must consider any fees in determining whether a director is eligible to serve on the committee.  This change provides additional flexibility for companies and aligns NASDAQ’s compensation committee independence criteria with those of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Issues General Solicitation Interpretations Under the JOBS Act

November 15, 2013 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On November 13, 2013, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) providing guidance on recent rule amendments lifting the ban on general solicitation in securities offerings made pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act, as mandated by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act). 

Read More
  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 48
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.