• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Peter Wardle

Peter Wardle

Partner, Los Angeles

[email protected]

+1 213.229.7242

Peter W. Wardle is a partner in the Los Angeles office of Gibson Dunn and co-chair of the firm’s Capital Markets Practice Group.

View Full Profile

Additional Helpful Updates to SEC’s S-3 Registration and Foreign Private Issuer C&DIs

March 31, 2025 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Securities Regulation

On March 20, 2025, the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission announced that it has updated certain Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“C&DIs”) related to Securities Act forms, Exchange Act forms, Regulation S-K and Securities Act Rules.

Read More

SEC Expands Accommodations for Draft Registration Statements

March 10, 2025 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Harrison Tucker Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; Registered Securities Offerings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

On March 3, 2025, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that it is further expanding existing accommodations to allow more companies to confidentially submit draft registration statements for nonpublic review.  These accommodations provide more flexibility for certain companies to initiate registration of their securities, spin-offs, and other offering processes without making the process initially public.

Read More

Supreme Court Upholds Tracing Requirement For Section 11 Claims in Direct Listings – Slack Technologies LLC v. Pirani, No. 21-200

June 6, 2023 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Ronald O. Mueller; Andrew L. Fabens; Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Capital Markets

On June 1, 2023, the Supreme Court of the United States unanimously upheld that  plaintiffs alleging the registration statement for a “direct listing" IPO contained a material misstatement or omission, who sue under Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, must trace the shares they bought  to the registration statement.  In a direct listing, unlike a traditional IPO, unregistered shares can be sold by non-affiliates on the initial listing date, so it is possible that certain shares bought on the first day will be unregistered shares and thus not subject to the strict liability standard of Section 11.   

Read More

SEC Adopts New Final Rules for Clearance and Settlement; Proposes Changes for Investment Adviser Rules

February 22, 2023 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Capital Markets; Private Placements; Registered Securities Offerings; Securities Regulation

On February 15, 2023, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") adopted final rule changes intended to reduce risk in clearance and settlement for most broker-dealer securities transactions and proposed new rules designed to enhance safeguards for customer assets managed by investment advisers.

Read More

Now Available: SEC Desktop Calendar for 2023

July 20, 2022 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Justine Robinson; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Financial Statements; IPOs; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Registered Securities Offerings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation; Underwriters and Agents

To continue assisting US companies with planning for SEC reporting and capital markets transactions into 2023, we offer our annual SEC Desktop Calendar. This calendar provides both the filing deadlines for key SEC reports and the dates on which financial statements in prospectuses and proxy statements must be updated before use (a/k/a financial staleness deadlines).

Read More

SEC Proposes Rule Changes to Shorten the Security Settlement Cycle to T+1 by March 31, 2024

February 14, 2022 | Posted by J. Alan Bannister; Boris Dolgonos; Andrew L. Fabens; Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Capital Markets; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On February 9, 2022, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) announced a proposed rule to shorten the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions from two business days after the trade date (“T+2″) to one business day after the trade date (“T+1″), while soliciting comments regarding challenges and possible approaches to achieving settlement by the end of trade date (“T+0″).

Read More

Recent SEC Amendments Bring Changes to Filing Fee Disclosure and Payment Methods

October 19, 2021 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; M&A; Miscellaneous; Registered Securities Offerings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

On October 13, 2021, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) adopted amendments to modernize filing fee disclosure for certain forms and schedules, as well as update payment methods for fees related to these filings. The final rule highlighted three primary goals of the amendments: (i) update disclosure requirements related to filing fees in order to provide more certainty to filers that the proper fee was calculated and facilitate the SEC staff’s review of such fee; (ii) modernize the payment method for filing fees and reduce the cost and burden on processing fee payments; and (iii) permit filers to reallocate previously paid filing fees in more situations than what was previously permitted. An overview of these changes is provided below. The amendments also contained certain technical, conforming and clarifying changes related to filing fee-related instructions and information.

Read More

Now Available: SEC Desktop Calendar for 2022

September 30, 2021 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; M&A; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

​To continue assisting US companies with planning for SEC reporting and capital markets transactions into 2022, we offer our annual SEC Desktop Calendar. This calendar provides both the filing deadlines for key SEC reports and the dates on which financial statements in prospectuses and proxy statements must be updated before use (a/k/a financial staleness deadlines).

Read More

SEC Staff Issues Cautionary Guidance Related to Business Combinations with SPACs

April 6, 2021 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Gerry Spedale Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Corporate Governance; Disclosure; Financial Statements; IPOs; Private Placements; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

​There were more initial public offerings (“IPOs") of special purpose acquisition companies (“SPACs") in 2020 alone than in the entire period from 2009 until 2019 combined, and in the first three months of 2021, there have been more SPAC IPOs than there were in all of 2020. All of these newly public SPACs are looking for business combinations and many private companies are or will be considering a combination with a SPAC as a way to go public.

Read More

SEC Adopts New Rule Relating to Submissions through EDGAR and Electronic and Remote Online Notarization

December 22, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On December 11, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") announced its adoption of a new rule under Regulation S-T in connection with its administration of the Electronic Data Gathering, Analysis, and Retrieval system (“EDGAR") to promote the reliability and integrity of EDGAR submissions, and also the adoption of revisions to Volumes I and II of the EDGAR Filer Manual and related rules under Regulation S-T, including provisions regarding electronic notarizations and remote online notarizations, which include electronic signatures.

Read More

Desktop Calendar of SEC Deadlines for 2021 Now Available

November 23, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Audit Committee; Capital Markets; Financial Statements; IPOs; Registered Securities Offerings; Securities Regulation

​To assist companies in planning for their SEC reporting and capital markets transactions in 2021, we have prepared a desktop reference calendar that sets forth filing deadlines for core SEC reports. Our calendar also provides SEC staleness dates (i.e., the last date financial statements may be used in a prospectus or proxy statement without being updated).

Read More

SEC Adopts Changes to the Exempt Offering Framework

November 7, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Eric Scarazzo Topic(s): Audit Committee; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​In an effort to facilitate capital formation and increase opportunities for investors by expanding access to capital for small and medium-sized businesses, on November 2, 2020, the SEC announced that it had approved amendments to certain of its rules relating to exempt offerings. The amendments follow the SEC’s June 2019 concept release and the SEC’s March 2020 proposing release on the harmonization of offering exemptions and reflect the SEC’s ongoing effort to harmonize, simplify and improve its offering framework. As discussed in our prior Monitor post (available here), the SEC has been working to untangle the current regulatory regime in order to ensure that capital-raising is rational, accessible and effective.

Read More

NYSE’s Attempt to Allow Primary Offerings in Direct Listings Hits a Snag

September 2, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Boris Dolgonos; Peter Wardle; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​Direct listings have emerged as one of the new innovative pathways to the U.S. public capital markets, thought to be ideal for entrepreneurial companies with a well-recognized brand name or easily understood business model. We have also found it attractive to companies that are already listed on a foreign exchange and are seeking a dual listing in the United States. Because direct listings are currently limited to secondary offerings by existing shareholders, they are not an attractive option for companies seeking to raise new capital in connection with a listing. 

Read More

SEC Expands the Definitions of “Accredited Investor” and “Qualified Institutional Buyer”

August 27, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Michael A. Titera; Ronald O. Mueller; Peter Wardle; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Audit Committee; Securities Regulation

Of particular interest as private capital markets activity continues to grow, the “accredited investor" definition is one of the principal tests for determining who is eligible to participate in investment opportunities presented by the private capital markets. On August 26, 2020, the SEC announced that it adopted amendments to the definitions of “accredited investor" in Rule 501, as well as the definition of “qualified institutional buyer" in Rule 144A, each under the Securities Act of 1933. These amendments are part of the SEC’s ongoing efforts to simplify, harmonize and improve the framework for securities offerings that are not registered with the SEC under the Securities Act (for more information on this initiative, see our prior Monitor post here).

Read More

Nasdaq Provides Temporary Exemption from Certain Shareholder Approval Requirements in Response to COVID-19

May 11, 2020 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On May 4, 2020, the SEC announced (available here) that it has immediately approved proposed rule changes by The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC (“Nasdaq") that provide listed companies with a temporary exception from certain shareholder approval requirements under the Nasdaq Rules (the “Rules") through and including June 30, 2020 (available here). 

Read More

NYSE and Nasdaq Propose Temporary Waivers of Certain Market Capitalization and Trading Price Listing Requirements

April 23, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Audit Committee; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​In light of the market downturn and similar to action taken in the Great Recession, the NYSE and Nasdaq have proposed temporary waivers of certain market capitalization and trading price listing requirements.

Read More

NYSE Provides Temporary Waiver of Certain Shareholder Approval Requirements for Private Placements

April 12, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Boris Dolgonos; Gerry Spedale Topic(s): Audit Committee; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​On April 6, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC") announced (available here) that it has immediately approved the New York Stock Exchange’s (“NYSE") proposed rule changes that temporarily waive certain shareholder approval requirements relating to private investments in public equity (PIPEs). The rule changes were proposed in light of the unprecedented disruption caused by COVID-19 and will apply through June 30, 2020. While these temporary waivers to Section 312.03 of the NYSE Listed Company Manual (the “Listing Manual") (available here) provide companies added flexibility in conducting PIPEs more quickly, companies must still obtain shareholder approval if required under any other applicable rule, including the equity compensation requirements of Section 303A.08 or the change of control requirements of Section 312.03(d) of the Listing Manual. For more information, please see our recent client alert (available here) discussing key considerations for PIPE transactions.

Read More

SEC Amends Rules to Encourage Issuers to Conduct Registered Debt Offerings

March 7, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Audit Committee; Securities Regulation

​On March 2, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission”) announced (available here) the adoption of amendments to the financial disclosure requirements applicable to registered debt offerings that include credit enhancements, such as subsidiary guarantees, in an effort to “improve the quality of disclosure and increase the likelihood that issuers will conduct debt offerings on a registered basis."

Read More

SEC Announces Proposed Amendments to MD&A and Guidance on Key Performance Indicators and Metrics; Commissioners Debate Addition of Sustainability Disclosure Requirements

February 7, 2020 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

​On January 30, 2020, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the SEC) issued proposed amendments to simplify the requirements of Regulation S-K and an interpretative release relating to Management’s Discussion and Analysis (“MD&A”).

Read More

Desktop Calendar of SEC Deadlines for 2020 Now Available

August 21, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell; James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

​This is a smart time of year to confirm plans for SEC reporting and capital markets transactions in 2020. To assist public companies in keeping track of the various filing deadlines, we have prepared a desktop reference calendar that sets forth filing deadlines for many SEC reports. To assist companies with planning capital markets transactions, including IPOs, our calendar also provides the staleness dates (i.e., the last date financial statements may be used in a prospectus or proxy statement without being updated).

Read More

SEC Seeks to Simplify and Harmonize Private Offering Exemptions

June 24, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On June 18, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission issued a concept release (available here) announcing that it isseeking comment on “possible ways to simplify, harmonize, and improve the exempt offering framework to promote capital formation and expand investment opportunities while maintaining appropriate investor protections.”

Read More

SEC Proposes Offering Reforms for BDCs and Registered Closed-End Funds

March 29, 2019 | Posted by Peter Wardle Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission") on March 20 proposed rule amendments (collectively, the “Proposal") to improve access to capital and facilitate investor communications by business development companies (“BDCs") and registered closed-end funds (collectively, the “affected funds").[1]

Read More

SEC Proposes Long-Awaited Expansion of “Test-the-Waters” to All Issuers – Use With Caution

February 20, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Stewart McDowell; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On February 19, 2019, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") proposed a new rule that would allow all issuers to engage in “testing the waters." Specifically, the SEC proposed an exemption (the “Proposed Rule") to certain provisions of Section 5 of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act") commonly referred to as “gun-jumping" provisions. This exemption would permit any issuer or authorized person (e.g., an underwriter) to engage in oral or written communications with potential investors that the issuer reasonably believes are qualified institutional buyers (“QIBs") or institutional accredited investors (“IAIs").  Currently, this exemption to the gun-jumping provisions is only available to emerging growth companies (“EGCs").  The SEC believes that the Proposed Rule may “help issuers better assess the demand for and valuation of their securities," which may in turn “enhance the ability of issuers to conduct successful offerings and lower their cost of capital."  This goal is consistent with the SEC’s overall effort to increase the number of public companies and reduce the regulatory burden of capital raising.

Read More

SEC Expands Regulation A to Allow Offerings by Reporting Companies

January 7, 2019 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On December 19, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC") adopted amendments to Regulation A allowing U.S. and Canadian companies that file reports under Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act"), to conduct securities offerings using Regulation A.  The amendments were mandated by the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief, and Consumer Protection Act, which was signed into law in May 2018.  

Read More

Desktop Calendar of SEC Deadlines for 2019 Now Available

November 12, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

November is a good time to confirm plans for SEC reporting and capital markets transactions in the next year. To assist public companies in keeping track of the various filing deadlines, we have prepared a desktop reference calendar that sets forth filing deadlines for many SEC reports. To assist companies with planning capital markets transactions, including IPOs, our calendar also provides the staleness dates for 2019 (i.e., the last date financial statements may be used in a prospectus or proxy statement without being updated).

Read More

SEC Proposes to Substantially Lighten Financial Disclosures for Issuers and Guarantors of Registered Debt

August 6, 2018 | Posted by J. Alan Bannister; Andrew L. Fabens; Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On July 24, 2018, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission") proposed amendments to Rules 3-10 and 3-16 of Regulation S-X (available here) in an effort to “simplify and streamline" the financial disclosures required in offerings of certain guaranteed debt and debt-like securities (collectively referred to as “debt securities"), as well as offerings of securities collateralized by securities of an affiliate of the registrant, registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act"). These proposed changes would, if implemented, facilitate greater speed to market for such public offerings, significantly reducing the Securities Act disclosure burdens for such registrants, as well as reducing the registrant’s disclosure obligations in its subsequent annual and interim reports required under Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act"). Taken together, the proposed changes represent a significant liberalization of the current disclosure requirements. 

Read More

Strengthening U.S. Public Capital Markets – Recommendations from SIFMA Report

May 11, 2018 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Elizabeth A. Ising; Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On April 27, 2018, the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association (“SIFMA”), the leading industry group representing broker-dealers, banks and asset managers, along with other securities industry related groups, released a report called “Expanding the On-Ramp: Recommendations to Help More Companies Go and Stay Public” (the “Report”).  In response to the decline in the number of IPOs and the number of public companies generally in the United States over the last twenty years, the Report provides recommendations aimed at reducing perceived impediments to becoming and remaining a public company. As the Report notes, the United States is now home to only about half the number of public companies that existed 20 years ago.  This decline is believed to have had adverse repercussions for the American economy generally, and the jobs market specifically.  In addition, the growth of private capital markets at the expense of public capital markets has raised concerns that individual investors are being marginalized.  More specifically, as many of the most innovative companies in the U.S. stay private longer and raise significant amounts of capital privately, the returns generated by such companies appear to accrue disproportionally to institutional, high net worth and other similar investors.

Read More

SEC Updates Guidance on Draft Registration Statements

August 21, 2017 | Posted by Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): JOBS Act

New SEC Policy Permits the Exclusion of Certain Financial Information from Draft Registration Statements; Additional Detail Provided Regarding Recent Updates to Draft Registration Statement Procedures

Read More

SEC Significantly Expands Confidential Review of Registration Statements

June 30, 2017 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Andrew L. Fabens; Elizabeth A. Ising; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Miscellaneous

Will Allow Confidential Submission of All Registration Statements for IPOs, Spin-Offs and Most Offerings Within 12 Months of an IPO or Spin-Off The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced[1] on Thursday that its the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) will soon allow all companies to submit initial public offering (“IPO”) draft registration statements for confidential review. This change expands a benefit previously reserved for Emerging Growth Companies (“EGCs”), and is specifically aimed at encouraging more companies to enter the public market.  The SEC also announced that it will review draft registration statements submitted by non EGCs that omit financial statements that the issuer reasonably believes will not be required when the registration statement is filed publicly, and indicated a willingness to discuss expedited reviews with issuers and their advisors. 

Read More

SEC Adopts Amendment Shortening Trade Settlement Cycle From T+3 to T+2 (potential implications)

March 25, 2017 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

The SEC has adopted an amendment to Rule 15c6-1(a) of the Exchange Act (the Settlement Cycle Rule) shortening the standard settlement cycle for most broker-dealer transactions from three business days after the trade date (“T+3”) to two business days after the trade date (“T+2”).  The compliance date for the amendment is September 5, 2017.  The new requirement will prohibit broker-dealers from effecting or entering into a contract for the purchase or sale of a security (other than exempted securities, government securities, municipal securities, commercial paper, bankers’ acceptances, and commercial bills) that provides for payment of funds and delivery of securities later than the second business day after the date of the contract, unless otherwise expressly agreed to by the parties at the time of the transaction.

Read More

Non-Voting Shares Make Their Public Debut and Generate Some Governance Concerns, but How Will Courts View the Structure When First Presented?

March 12, 2017 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Elizabeth A. Ising; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

On March 1, 2017, Snap Inc. (“Snap” or the “Company”) – owner of the popular social media platform Snapchat – priced its highly anticipated initial public offering (“IPO”). With 200 million shares sold at $17 per share, the IPO raised approximately $3.4 billion for the Company. On their first trading day, Snap shares opened at $22.41 per share and peaked as high as $28.84 the following day. As of March 10, shares closed at $22.07, above its initial offering price, but below its opening trading price. As the largest IPO of any U.S.-based company since Facebook’s public offering in 2012, many investors’ primary focus here has been on the complete lack of voting privileges associated with the shares sold in the IPO. 

Read More

SEC Adopts Requirements for Active Hyperlinks In Exhibit Indexes

March 7, 2017 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Securities Regulation

The SEC has adopted final rules requiring an active hyperlink to each filed exhibit identified in the exhibit index of most Securities Act and Exchange Act registration statements and reports that are required to include exhibits under Item 601 of Regulation S-K.  The rules become effective on September 1, 2017 (though the adopting release encourages early compliance), provided that smaller reporting companies and non-accelerated filers that submit filings in ASCII format need not comply with the rules until September 1, 2018.  The new requirements will apply to Forms S-1, S-3, S-4, S-8, S-11, F-1, F-3, F-4, SF-1, SF-3, 10, 10-K, 10-Q, 8-K, F-10, 20-F and 10-D (though the compliance date for Form 10-D will be announced at a later date).  The requirement will not apply to other forms under the multi-jurisdictional disclosure system used by certain Canadian issuers or to Form 6-K, as exhibits and exhibit indexes are not required by those forms. 

Read More

SEC Files Fraud Charges Against Public Biotechnology Company and its Officers for Alleged Materially Misleading FDA-Related Disclosures

March 30, 2016 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 29, 2016, the SEC announced that it had filed fraud charges in U.S. federal court against AVEO Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“AVEO”), a Massachusetts-based biotechnology company, and three of its former executives. The complaint alleges that AVEO and its former Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and Chief Medical Officer violated the antifraud provisions of the federal securities laws by misleading investors about the company’s communications with the FDA during the approval process for tivozanib, AVEO’s leading product candidate being developed as a treatment for kidney cancer. According to the complaint, the FDA raised concerns to AVEO in a May 2012 pre-NDA, or New Drug Application, meeting related to the survival rates of patients receiving tivozanib during AVEO’s first clinical trial of tivozanib relative to patients receiving the other compound, sorafenib, being used as a comparator in the trial. An NDA is the formal process by which a company seeks FDA approval of a new pharmaceutical for commercialization. In the pre-NDA meeting, FDA staff recommended that AVEO conduct a second clinical trial. The SEC alleged in its complaint that, for more than eleven months following the FDA’s recommendation of a second clinical trial, AVEO and the officers named in the complaint concealed from investors the extent of the FDA’s concerns about tivozanib and its recommendation that the company conduct a second clinical trial. Among other charges, the SEC alleged that:

Read More

“FAST” Act Legislation Enacted — Potentially Significant Impact on Capital Markets

December 6, 2015 | Posted by Peter Wardle; Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On December 4, 2015, President Obama signed into law the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act, known as the “FAST Act.”  This five-year transportation bill also includes a number of provisions related to securities laws and capital-raising measures. The key securities law provisions of the FAST Act are summarized as follows: Reforming Access for Investments in Startup Enterprises:

Read More

SEC Adopts Final Crowdfunding Rules

November 2, 2015 | Posted by Peter Wardle; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On October 30, 2015, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) voted to adopt final rules permitting companies to offer and sell securities through crowdfunding.  The new rules, a response to evolving methods of online fundraising for a variety of firms and projects, are meant to assist smaller companies with capital formation and provide additional protections to investors. We previously discussed the proposed crowdfunding rules here; the text of the final rules has not yet been issued, but a copy of the proposed rules is available here.

Read More

SEC Publishes Interpretations regarding “Regulation A+”

June 25, 2015 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Securities Regulation

On June 23, 2015, the Staff (the “Staff”) of the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) published several new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (“Interpretations”) relating to rules and forms under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”).  These Interpretations address questions and considerations relating to “Regulation A+”, which was adopted by the SEC on March 25, and became effective last Friday, June 19.

Read More

NASDAQ Issues FAQ Relaxing Historical Position on Net Share Settled Convertible Securities

May 8, 2015 | Posted by Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Miscellaneous

In a change that we believe has gotten little attention to date, in March 2015 NASDAQ updated its publicly available “Frequently Asked Questions” relating to the application of NASDAQ’s shareholder approval rules to net share settled convertible securities issued in private placements.

Read More

SEC Votes Unanimously to Overhaul and Expand Regulation A; “Regulation A+” to Serve as an Exemption for Offerings up to $50 Million

March 26, 2015 | Posted by Peter Wardle; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) voted unanimously on March 25, 2015 to expand significantly the ability of certain issuers to raise capital in transactions exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. This new regime, commonly referred to as “Regulation A+,” is intended to create additional opportunities for companies to raise capital without having to comply with the more burdensome aspects of the traditional registration process. The adopting release, including text of the final rules, is available at https://www.sec.gov/rules/final/2015/33-9741.pdf.

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules to Implement “Regulation A-Plus” Exemption Under the JOBS Act

December 18, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed rules to implement a new exemption from registration for securities offerings made pursuant to Section 3(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), as mandated by Section 401 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act).  This new offering exemption is commonly referred to as “Regulation A-Plus.

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Issues “Bad Actor” Rule Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations

December 6, 2013 | Posted by Peter Wardle Topic(s): Dodd Frank; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On December 4, 2013, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) providing guidance on rules recently adopted by the SEC that prohibit certain felons and other “bad actors” from participating in private securities offerings that rely on Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act).  The rule generally applies to the issuer, certain third parties that participate in the offering, and certain controlling persons, officers and affiliates of the issuer and such third parties (covered persons).

Read More

Removal of General Solicitation Ban, Bad Actor Disqualification Rules to Become Effective September 23, 2013; Comment Period on Related Proposed Amendments Also to End September 23, 2013

July 24, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

The Commission’s final rules to remove the ban on general solicitation and general advertising in offerings pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and to disqualify felons and certain other “bad actors” from participating in offerings pursuant to Rule 506, were published in the Federal Register today.  As a consequence, the final rules will become effective on September 23, 2013.

Read More

SEC Approves Final Rules to Permit Advertising in Rule 506 and Rule 144A Offerings; Also Proposes Rules to Add Additional Investor Protections

July 11, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

At an Open Commission Meeting on July 10, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) adopted final rules to eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising (together, “general solicitation”) in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act, as required by Section 201(a) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”).  Rule 506 currently permits an issuer to raise an unlimited amount of capital in a private placement to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors provided that the issuer does not engage in general solicitation; it is the most widely used exemption under Regulation D.  Rule 144A permits the resale of an unlimited amount of securities in a private transaction to qualified institutional buyers.  The Commission approved the rules by a vote of 4-1 with Commissioner Aguilar dissenting.

Read More

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.