The decision provides meaningful guidance on the interaction between Section 144’s new “heightened” presumption—that directors deemed independent under applicable national securities exchange rules are also presumed to be disinterested under Section 144—and Court of Chancery Rule 23.1’s well-established demand-futility standard.
Justine Y. Drohan
Associate Attorney, New York
+1 212.351.5375
Justine Drohan is a litigation associate in the New York office of Gibson Dunn.