• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

SEC Issues Second Set of FAQs on Conflict Minerals Rules

April 7, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On April 7, 2014 the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued a second set of Frequently Asked Questions (“FAQs”) on its conflict minerals rules (Exchange Act Section 13(p), Rule 13p-1 and Item 1.01 of Form SD).  The full set of FAQs, including the nine new FAQs and the 12 FAQs issued in May 2013, is available at http://www.sec.gov/divisions/corpfin/guidance/conflictminerals-faq.htm.  For more information about the conflict minerals rules, please see our client alert available at https://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/pages/ConflictMinerals-UnderstandingFinalSECRules.aspx, and for a discussion of the first set of FAQs, please see our client alert available at https://www.gibsondunn.com/publications/pages/SEC-Issues-FAQs-On-Conflict-Minerals.aspx.

Read More

Corp Fin Issues Revised Statement on WKSI Waivers

March 26, 2014 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Miscellaneous; Securities Regulation

On March 12, 2014, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance (Corp Fin) issued a Revised Statement on Well-Known Seasoned Issuer Waivers (the Revised Statement). 

Read More

ISS To Revise QuickScore

January 9, 2014 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation

On January 8, 2014, Institutional Shareholder Services, Inc. (“ISS”) announced that it will launch a new version of QuickScore (“QuickScore 2.0”) on February 18, 2014.  QuickScore benchmarks a company’s governance risk against other companies in the Russell 3000 Index based on a number of weighted governance factors.  QuickScore 2.0 will use a different method to score companies’ governance risk and will automatically reflect changes in companies’ governance structures based on publicly disclosed information.    

    Read More

U.S. Court of Appeals Hears Argument on SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rules

January 8, 2014 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

Yesterday the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit heard oral argument in a suit challenging the SEC’s conflict minerals rules, which were mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act and issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012.  The case came to the D.C. Circuit on appeal from a July 2013 district court decision upholding the SEC’s rules.  The rules had been challenged by the National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable (the “Appellants”).

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules to Implement “Regulation A-Plus” Exemption Under the JOBS Act

December 18, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney; Peter Wardle Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission today proposed rules to implement a new exemption from registration for securities offerings made pursuant to Section 3(b)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act), as mandated by Section 401 of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act).  This new offering exemption is commonly referred to as “Regulation A-Plus.

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Issues “Bad Actor” Rule Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations

December 6, 2013 | Posted by Peter Wardle Topic(s): Dodd Frank; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On December 4, 2013, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) providing guidance on rules recently adopted by the SEC that prohibit certain felons and other “bad actors” from participating in private securities offerings that rely on Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act).  The rule generally applies to the issuer, certain third parties that participate in the offering, and certain controlling persons, officers and affiliates of the issuer and such third parties (covered persons).

Read More

NASDAQ Amends New Compensation Committee Independence Criteria to Provide Flexibility

December 3, 2013 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) has amended its new rules on compensation committee independence to provide additional flexibility for committee members to meet the independence criteria.  As a result of the amendment, NASDAQ rules will no longer prohibit a director from serving on a listed company’s compensation committee if the director receives fees from the company.  Instead, boards must consider any fees in determining whether a director is eligible to serve on the committee.  This change provides additional flexibility for companies and aligns NASDAQ’s compensation committee independence criteria with those of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Issues General Solicitation Interpretations Under the JOBS Act

November 15, 2013 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On November 13, 2013, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) providing guidance on recent rule amendments lifting the ban on general solicitation in securities offerings made pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act, as mandated by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act). 

Read More

ISS Opens Comment Period for 2014 Proxy Voting Policies

October 24, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Corporate Governance

On October 22, 2013, Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) announced two proposed changes to its 2014 U.S. proxy voting policy.  ISS requested comments on the proposed changes, which can be submitted via e-mail to policy@issgovernance.com by November 4, 2013.  ISS will take the comments into account when issuing its 2014 proxy voting policies.  It is important to note that ISS’s final U.S. policy updates for 2014, which are expected to be released in November, may reflect additional changes beyond the two on which ISS has solicited comments. 

Read More

SEC Proposes Crowdfunding Rules

October 24, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) held an open meeting to approve the release of proposed crowdfunding rules implementing Title III of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”).  Once the SEC adopts final implementing rules, the crowdfunding exemption contained in Section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) will allow U.S. private companies (primarily startups and small businesses) to raise up to $1 million in any 12-month period from pools of small investors without registration under the Securities Act.  The fundraising will be required to be conducted through a registered intermediary—either a registered broker or an online “funding portal.”   While the SEC missed the December 31, 2012 deadline to adopt implementing rules, it now appears to be moving ahead full speed with the proposed rulemaking.

Read More
  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 49
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean C. Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Gerry Spedale

Michael A. Titera

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society for Corporate Governance
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • TheCorporateCounsel.net
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky Blog
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.