• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

NASDAQ Amends New Compensation Committee Independence Criteria to Provide Flexibility

December 3, 2013 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee

The NASDAQ Stock Market LLC (“NASDAQ”) has amended its new rules on compensation committee independence to provide additional flexibility for committee members to meet the independence criteria.  As a result of the amendment, NASDAQ rules will no longer prohibit a director from serving on a listed company’s compensation committee if the director receives fees from the company.  Instead, boards must consider any fees in determining whether a director is eligible to serve on the committee.  This change provides additional flexibility for companies and aligns NASDAQ’s compensation committee independence criteria with those of the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”).

Read More

SEC Corp Fin Staff Issues General Solicitation Interpretations Under the JOBS Act

November 15, 2013 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

On November 13, 2013, the Staff of the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance issued new Compliance and Disclosure Interpretations (C&DIs) providing guidance on recent rule amendments lifting the ban on general solicitation in securities offerings made pursuant to Rule 506(c) of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (Securities Act) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act, as mandated by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (JOBS Act). 

Read More

ISS Opens Comment Period for 2014 Proxy Voting Policies

October 24, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Corporate Governance

On October 22, 2013, Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) announced two proposed changes to its 2014 U.S. proxy voting policy.  ISS requested comments on the proposed changes, which can be submitted via e-mail to [email protected] by November 4, 2013.  ISS will take the comments into account when issuing its 2014 proxy voting policies.  It is important to note that ISS’s final U.S. policy updates for 2014, which are expected to be released in November, may reflect additional changes beyond the two on which ISS has solicited comments. 

Read More

SEC Proposes Crowdfunding Rules

October 24, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

Yesterday, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) held an open meeting to approve the release of proposed crowdfunding rules implementing Title III of the 2012 Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”).  Once the SEC adopts final implementing rules, the crowdfunding exemption contained in Section 4(a)(6) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) will allow U.S. private companies (primarily startups and small businesses) to raise up to $1 million in any 12-month period from pools of small investors without registration under the Securities Act.  The fundraising will be required to be conducted through a registered intermediary—either a registered broker or an online “funding portal.”   While the SEC missed the December 31, 2012 deadline to adopt implementing rules, it now appears to be moving ahead full speed with the proposed rulemaking.

Read More

Vanguard Proactively Reaching Out to Companies to Address Governance Concerns

October 16, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Corporate Governance

In anticipation of the 2014 proxy season, Vanguard is sending letters to approximately 350 companies to proactively engage with them on governance issues.  The letters are tailored to the individual companies and identify governance practices at the companies that Vanguard believes are not in line with what Vanguard views as best practices. 

Read More

Private Placement of Publicly Traded Equity Securities as Consideration in an M&A Transaction after the JOBS Act

October 3, 2013 | Posted by Robert B. Little; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

In April 2012, we wrote here about the potential future impact of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) on M&A transactions in which an acquirer seeks to issue its privately placed equity securities as consideration in an acquisition.  Our discussion at the time focused on the conditions of Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and, in particular, the tension faced by issuers that are required to determine the offerees’ status as “accredited investors” or as otherwise suitable to evaluate the potential investment.  We noted that such issuers have historically been prohibited from using any form of “general solicitation” when offering securities in such transactions.  Subsequently, in July 2013, the SEC adopted final rules (effective September 23, 2013) to eliminate the absolute prohibition against general solicitation in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506, as required by Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act (Gibson Dunn’s summary and analysis of the rules may be found here).  The following discussion updates our earlier post to address the legal and practical effects of these new rules for M&A transactions that include a private placement component.

Read More

SEC Staff Grants Request to Exclude Rule 14a-8 Shareholder Proposal Regarding Repayment of Student Loans

October 2, 2013 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; Elizabeth A. Ising Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Gibson Dunn successfully represented DeVry Inc. in obtaining no-action relief from the SEC staff (the “Staff”) for the exclusion of a shareholder proposal requesting that DeVry “annually report to shareholders on the expected ability of students at Company-owned institutions to repay their student loans.”  The shareholder proposal, which was submitted by the New York City Comptroller’s Office on behalf of several New York City pension funds, specified particular quantitative and other information to be included in the requested report. DeVry’s no-action request argued that DeVry could exclude the shareholder proposal under Rule 14a-8(i)(7) as relating to DeVry’s ordinary business operations because the proposal implicated decisions concerning product quality.  The no-action request identified shareholder proposal precedents relating to the quality of products or services in other industries (such as beverages and banking) and pointed out that, similar to those precedents, the proposal at issue was focused on the quality of DeVry’s educational services.  In a response letter dated September 6, 2013, the Staff concurred that the shareholder proposal could be excluded, noting that “the proposal focuses primarily on information the company should provide regarding the quality of its educational services” and that “[p]roposals that concern product quality are generally excludable under rule 14a-8(i)(7).” The Staff’s decision to grant DeVry’s no-action request is notable because the Staff had denied a no-action request earlier this year regarding an identical shareholder proposal submitted to another company.  The earlier no-action request had also asserted that the proposal was excludable under Rule 14a-8(i)(7), but its reasoning focused on the proposal’s infringement of the company’s risk assessment practices and compliance with laws rather than on how the proposal implicated the quality of the company’s products or services.  The Staff’s concurrence with DeVry’s no-action request highlights the importance of identifying the appropriate issue that may support exclusion of a shareholder proposal, exploring and addressing any precedents and clearly articulating the reasons for which the proposal implicates a particular basis for exclusion.

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules Regarding Internal Pay Ratio Disclosure

September 18, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation; Securities Regulation

The SEC today held an open meeting and voted, 3-2, to approve the issuance of proposed rules to implement the internal pay ratio disclosure requirement in Section 953(b) of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”).  SEC Chair Mary Jo White and Commissioners Kara Stein and Luis Aguilar voted to propose the rules and Commissioners Daniel Gallagher and Michael Piwowar dissented.  Statements made by the Commissioners today regarding the proposal are on the SEC website and available here.  The comment period for the SEC’s proposed rules will be 60 days after the proposing release is published in the Federal Register; the proposing release is on the SEC website and available here.

Read More

Reminder to Respond This Week to the ISS Policy Survey

September 11, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Corporate Governance

Companies wishing to participate in Institutional Shareholder Services’ (“ISS”) annual global policy survey should do so this week. The ISS policy survey closes on September 13.  Public companies and others are urged to submit their views by completing the survey, as ISS considers the responses to its survey when developing its proxy voting policies for the coming proxy season.  When responding to the survey, it is not necessary to enter a response to every question that is asked. 

Read More

NGOs Release Report on Expectations for Conflict Minerals Reporting

September 10, 2013 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On September 5, 2013, a white paper titled, “Expectations for Companies’ Conflict Minerals Reporting,” was released by two NGOs dedicated to human rights issues, the Enough Project and the Responsible Sourcing Network, describing in detail the expectations and suggestions of certain sustainable and responsible investors, or SRIs, and nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs, for the content of Form SD filings and Conflict Minerals Reports expected to be filed with the SEC next year.  The two groups make a number of suggestions that far-exceed the literal requirements of the SEC’s conflict minerals rules.  The paper, which is available at www.enoughproject.org/files/Expectations-for-Companies-Conflict-Minerals-Reporting.pdf, suggests that issuers disclose, among other things:

Read More
  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 26
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 48
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.