The New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) has amended its rules on companies’ notifications to the NYSE about upcoming dividends. The rule changes were approved by the Securities and Exchange Commission on Monday, August 14 and took effect immediately. The amended rules require companies that intend to make announcements outside market hours that involve dividends or stock distributions to notify the NYSE at least ten minutes before making the announcement. The NYSE has not made any changes to the requirements for announcements made during market hours. A blackline of the changes to the text of the Listed Company Manual is available here. A chart prepared by the NYSE in anticipation of the rule change comparing the requirements that will apply during and outside of market hours is available here. Under the NYSE’s policy on the immediate release of material news, found in Section 202.05 of the Listed Company Manual, NYSE companies must release quickly to the public any news or information that might reasonably be expected to materially affect trading in their securities. Under Section 202.06, which details the procedures for public release of information under this policy, a listed company must alert the NYSE at least ten minutes in advance when its intends to release news between the hours of 7:00 a.m. (eastern) and the close of trading on the NYSE (generally 4:00 p.m. eastern). Listed companies announcing dividend or stock distributions during these hours must comply with the immediate release policy. Accordingly, companies that publicly announce a dividend or distribution during market hours must call the NYSE’s Market Watch team, and email Market Watch a copy of the proposed announcement, at least ten minutes in advance of issuing the announcement. Companies must have NYSE approval before issuing a dividend or distribution announcement. As a result of the rule changes, companies will have to notify the NYSE at least ten minutes in advance of an announcement involving a dividend or stock distribution made at any time, rather than just during the hours when the immediate release policy is in effect. Companies providing this advance notification to the NYSE outside of the immediate release policy timeframe will not have to wait for NYSE approval before making their announcements. However, in filing the rule proposal, the NYSE stated that it intends to have staff available at all times to review dividend and stock distribution notices immediately upon receipt by the NYSE, “regardless of what time or day of the week they are provided.” NYSE staff will contact a listed company “immediately” if there is a problem with the notification. The NYSE “strongly encourages” companies to submit their dividend notifications through Listing Manager, the NYSE’s web portal. The rule changes do not alter other requirements relating to dividends and distributions, including: (1) the requirement in Section 204.12 that companies give notice to the NYSE promptly, and at least ten days in advance of the record date, of any action relating to a dividend or stock distribution, including notice of the omission or postponement of a dividend action at the customary time, and declaration of a dividend; and (2) the requirement in Section 204.21 that companies give prompt notice to the NYSE of the fixing of a record date for dividends and stock distributions. According to the NYSE, the purpose of the rule changes is to enable NYSE staff to work with listed companies in addressing any issues that may arise in relation to announcements involving dividends or stock distributions. Among other things, the NYSE will be able to confirm that a company’s proposed dividend schedule complies with NYSE requirements, and that the company’s disclosure about application of the NYSE’s ex-dividend trading policy is accurate. The ex-dividend date is the last date on which a buyer can purchase a company’s stock and still be entitled to receive a dividend that has already been declared. As a reminder, with the upcoming transition from a T+3 to T+2 settlement cycle, which will occur on September 5, 2017, the NYSE has announced that no securities will be ex-dividend on September 5, 2017 to avoid confusion about the proper time frame for settlement. The change to T+2 will also shorten the time period for which transactions in stocks will be ex-dividend to the business day before the record date for the dividend (from two business days before the record date).
Major Indices Move to Curb Multiple Class Structures
Multiple class share structures have come under increasing scrutiny since Snap Inc. (“Snap”) offered exclusively non-voting shares in its March 1, 2017, initial public offering (“IPO”). Companies employing the multiple-class structure argue that the structure contributes to corporate stability and long-term returns for shareholders, and aides in the revival of the sluggish IPO market by helping issuers overcome a reluctance to go public in the face of activist investors. However, citing corporate governance concerns and following considerable pressure and lobbying from institutional investors, both the FTSE Russell and Standard & Poor (“S&P”) Dow Jones have recently taken measures that may be seen as discouraging the practice.
ISS Releases Surveys for 2018 Policy Updates
On August 3, 2017, the proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”) launched its annual policy survey. Each year, ISS solicits comments in connection with the review of its proxy voting policies. ISS then uses the data to inform its voting policy review. At the end of this process, ISS will announce its updated proxy voting policies applicable to 2018 shareholder meetings.
Delaware Approves Use of Blockchain in New DGCL Amendments
On July 21, 2017, Delaware Governor John C. Carney Jr. signed into law, effective August 1, 2017, Senate Bill 69 (“SB 69”), amending Delaware’s General Corporation Law (“DGCL”) to, among other things, allow corporations to utilize electronic databases and blockchain technology to maintain and distribute certain corporate records. The passage of SB 69 further solidifies Delaware’s position as the leader in corporate regulatory innovation by demonstrating the state’s readiness to embrace new and innovative technologies being utilized by the corporate market.
SEC Requests Comments on New PCAOB Auditor Reporting Standard
On June 1, 2017, the PCAOB adopted a new auditor reporting standard—PCAOB Release No. 2017-001, The Auditor’s Report on an Audit of Financial Statements When the Auditor Expresses an Unqualified Opinion and Related Amendments to PCAOB Standards(the “Standard”)—that will be significant for public companies. A copy of our prior client alert on the Standard is here.
SEC Warns that Securities Laws May Apply to Initial Coin Offerings and Other Digital Currency Sales
On Tuesday, July 25, 2017, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) issued a Report of Investigation (the “Report”) finding for the first time that an offer and sale of virtual currency, often called an Initial Coin Offering (abbreviated “ICO”) or “Token Sale”, can be subject to U.S. federal securities laws. While the SEC decided not to pursue an enforcement action in this particular instance, the SEC did find that that the ICO that was the subject of the Report involved an offering of securities subject to U.S. federal securities laws.
SEC Chairman Jay Clayton Delivers First Public Remarks Since Confirmation
In his first public speech since being confirmed as Chairman of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “the Commission”), Jay Clayton addressed the Economic Club of New York on July 12, 2017. In his remarks, available here, Chairman Clayton discussed his vision of the principles that should guide the Commission and opportunities to apply those principles in practice.
SEC Significantly Expands Confidential Review of Registration Statements
Will Allow Confidential Submission of All Registration Statements for IPOs, Spin-Offs and Most Offerings Within 12 Months of an IPO or Spin-Off The Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced[1] on Thursday that its the Staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the “Staff”) will soon allow all companies to submit initial public offering (“IPO”) draft registration statements for confidential review. This change expands a benefit previously reserved for Emerging Growth Companies (“EGCs”), and is specifically aimed at encouraging more companies to enter the public market. The SEC also announced that it will review draft registration statements submitted by non EGCs that omit financial statements that the issuer reasonably believes will not be required when the registration statement is filed publicly, and indicated a willingness to discuss expedited reviews with issuers and their advisors.
SEC Economist Comments on New Technologies Used by the Commission to Identify Risk, Detect Fraud and Enforce the Securities Laws
Last week Scott Bauguess, Acting Director and Acting Chief Economist of the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) Division of Economic Risk and Analysis, shared insights about how the SEC is leveraging artificial intelligence and machine learning to track, and perhaps predict, emerging risks in the marketplace.[1] In the latest in a series of speeches,[2] Bauguess also described how the SEC is using big data, harnessed with the appropriate processing power and partnered with human intuition, to focus investigative and enforcement resources. While Bauguess and others at the SEC see a bright future for data analytics at the SEC, particularly in identifying emerging trends, Bauguess stressed the human element is ever important in assessing risk, combatting fraud and bringing or recommending enforcement actions.
Changes Coming to Governance Provisions of New York Nonprofit Law
Amendments to New York’s Not-For-Profit Corporation Law are set to take effect on May 27. The amendments impact several provisions of The New York Nonprofit Revitalization Act (“NRA”), which imposed substantial governance requirements on nonprofits when it took effect in 2014. The amendments build greater flexibility into aspects of the NRA that were viewed as overly broad or prescriptive. Key elements of the amendments are summarized below. A redline showing the changes to the statutory language is available here. Nonprofits incorporated in New York, and other nonprofits that may be subject to the Not-For-Profit Corporation Law due to their activities, should take note of the amendments and consider whether changes to their governance practices and documents are appropriate. 1. Related party transactions. The NRA provides for enhanced board oversight of related party transactions. The amendments explicitly permit an authorized committee of the board to review and approve related party transactions, as an alternative to full board approval. They also codify exceptions to the definition of “related party transaction” that are based on guidance previously issued by the Charities Bureau of the New York Attorney General’s office (available here). These exceptions mean that immaterial or ordinary course transactions are no longer subject to the board/committee approval procedures under the NRA. Specifically, the exceptions cover: (a) transactions that are themselves “de minimis” or where the related party’s financial interest is de minimis, with the judgment of what is de minimis to be left to individual nonprofits based on factors such as size and budget; (b) transactions that “would not customarily be reviewed” by the board at “similar organizations in the ordinary course of business” and that are available to others on the same or similar terms; and (c) transactions where a related party receives a benefit as a result of being a member of a class that benefits from the nonprofit’s work, where the benefit is available to all similarly situated members of the class on the same terms. The amendments also create a defense to actions brought by the New York Attorney General challenging related party transactions. The defense allows nonprofits to take steps to ratify transactions that were not approved in accordance with the procedures in the NRA, and to enhance their mechanisms for complying with these procedures in the future, in order to limit the possibility of adverse actions against nonprofits for inadvertent or insignificant violations of the related party provisions. 2. Audit committee independence requirements. The amendments modify the definition of “independent director,” which applies to directors serving on the audit committee, by amending the standard on business relationships between a nonprofit and entities where directors (or their relatives) have relationships. Currently, this standard prohibits a director from being independent if the director is an employee of, or has a substantial financial interest in, an entity that does business with the nonprofit, if the amount of business exceeded the lesser of $25K or 2% of the other entity’s consolidated gross revenues in any of the last three fiscal years. The amendments provide tiered thresholds that are tied to the revenues of the other entity, as follows: