• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

Compensation Committee

Guidance on Compensation Committees’ Assessment of Adviser Independence

May 22, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Brian J. Lane; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation

As discussed in our April 26, 2013 posting on the Gibson Dunn Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor, under recently amended NYSE Rule 303A.05 and NASDAQ Rule 5605(d), board compensation committees cannot select or receive advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser without first taking into consideration that adviser’s independence, including consideration of the factors enumerated in the rules.  As compensation committees and their advisers are preparing for the July 1 effective date of these new listing standards, three observations are important:

Read More

July 1, 2013 Deadline Approaches for Updates to Compensation Committee Charters

April 26, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation

By July 1, 2013, companies listed on the New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) and NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”) must comply with new listing standards relating to compensation committees and their responsibilities and authority with respect to outside advisers.  In view of the upcoming deadline, listed companies should review and update their compensation committee charters to provide the committee with these responsibilities and authority.  In addition, compensation committees will need to assess the independence of their advisers in the coming months so they can receive advice from them after July 1.

Read More

ISS Offers Companies Opportunity to Update Peer Group Information; Action Required by December 21, 2012

December 10, 2012 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Say on Pay

As part of its 2013 Policy Updates, ISS is revising its methodology for determining the peer group used to perform its quantitative pay-for-performance evaluation.  In determining a company’s peer group, ISS’s new methodology will incorporate information from companies’ self-selected pay comparison peer groups, as disclosed in the proxy statement.  ISS recognizes that some companies may have modified their peer groups since their most recent disclosure or may intend to do so in the preparation of their 2013 proxy statements. 

Read More

SEC Approves NASDAQ Rule Change for Independent Directors

July 31, 2012 | Posted by James J. Moloney Topic(s): Audit Committee; Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance

On July 19, 2012, the SEC approved a proposed change to NASDAQ’s rules regarding membership on a listed company’s audit, compensation and/or nominations committee.  NASDAQ sought to modify an exception to its Rule 5605, which allows a non-independent director to serve on such committees “under exceptional and limited circumstances” for up to two years.  The amendment provides an exception allowing a non-independent director to serve on a company’s audit, compensation and/or nominations committee, where the director has a family member serving as a non-executive employee of the company, so long as the listed company’s board concludes that the director’s membership on the relevant committee is “required by the best interest of the company and its shareholders.”The SEC’s release is available at here.

Read More

Glass Lewis Implements Changes to its Voting Analysis Model

July 13, 2012 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Executive Compensation; Say on Pay

GLass Lewis & Co. has announced that, effective for annual meetings taking place after July 1, 2012, it has implemented a number of revisions to its proprietary pay for performance quantitative model.  Glass Lewis uses the quantitative model to analyze the degree of alignment between corporate performance and named executive officer compensation.  When making voting recommendations to its subscribers on say-on-pay proposals, Glass Lewis analyzes both the quantitative analysis and a qualitative analysis of the company’s named executive officer compensation program. 

Read More

U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Adopts Rules Implementing Dodd-Frank Requirements for Listing Standards Applicable to Compensation Committees

June 20, 2012 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation

The SEC today adopted rules to implement Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Act, requiring stock exchanges to adopt listing standards that:

  • impose independence requirements on compensation committee members,
  • authorize compensation committees to retain independent advisers, and
  • require compensation committees to assess the independence of any consultant, legal counsel or other adviser that provides advice to the compensation committee, other than in-house counsel. 
    Read More

Survey of Responses to Say-on-Pay Advisory Votes from Recently Filed Proxy Statements

March 22, 2012 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation; Say on Pay

We have been monitoring proxy statement disclosures made by S&P 500 companies pursuant to Item 402(b)(1)(vii) of Regulation S-K.  That provision, which was added as part of the SEC’s say-on-pay rules, requires companies to discuss in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis (CD&A), “[w]hether and, if so, how the registrant has considered the results of the most recent shareholder advisory vote on executive compensation . . . in determining compensation policies and decisions and, if so, how that consideration has affected the registrant’s executive compensation decisions and policies.” 

Read More

ISS Issues White Paper on New Approach in Evaluating Pay for Performance Alignment

December 27, 2011 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Say on Pay

On December 20, 2011, Institutional Shareholder Services ("ISS"), a leading proxy advisory firm, published a white paper titled "Evaluating Pay for Performance Alignment: ISS’ Quantitative and Qualitative Approach."  The white paper provides greater guidance on ISS’ new approach to establishing peer groups when conducting the pay-for-performance test described in its U.S. Corporate Governance Policy 2012 Updates and provides a detailed summary of and rationale for the new quantitative and qualitative methodology ISS will implement, beginning February 1, 2012, when assessing executive compensation.  The white paper is available at

Read More

SEC Proposes Rules on Compensation Committee Independence and the Role of Compensation Consultants and Other Advisers

March 31, 2011 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation

On March 30, 2011, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) voted unanimously to propose rules implementing Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) relating to:  (1) compensation committee member independence; (2) compensation consultant and other adviser independence; and (3) compensation committee authority to retain, and disclosure regarding use of, compensation consultants and other advisers.  In our July 21, 2010 client memorandum, available here, we describe in detail Section 952 of the Dodd-Frank Act, which added a new Section 10C to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”).

Read More

SEC Amends E-Proxy Rules

March 1, 2010 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Securities Regulation

The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") recently approved amendments to its notice and access (e-proxy) rules that are designed to increase participation in the e-proxy process.  Under the prior e-proxy rules, the SEC mandated the exact form and content that had to appear on the Notice of Internet Availability (the "Notice").  Concerns have been expressed that the Notice rules limited the ability of issuers to communicate effectively about the e-proxy process, which resulted in lower shareholder participation rates for e-proxy, particularly among retail investors. 

Read More
  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.