• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

SEC Expands Accommodations for Draft Registration Statements

March 10, 2025 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Hillary H. Holmes; Peter Wardle; Harrison Tucker Topic(s): Capital Markets; Disclosure; IPOs; Registered Securities Offerings; Registration Statements; Securities Regulation

On March 3, 2025, the Division of Corporation Finance of the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) announced that it is further expanding existing accommodations to allow more companies to confidentially submit draft registration statements for nonpublic review.  These accommodations provide more flexibility for certain companies to initiate registration of their securities, spin-offs, and other offering processes without making the process initially public.

Expanded Accommodations

As discussed in greater detail below, new accommodations include the following:

  • Confidential submission is available for initial registration statements under both Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), in connection with a spin-off and Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act in connection with securities registrations upon triggering shareholder and asset value thresholds;
  • Foreign private issuers now have expanded options for submitting draft registration statements, including electing to be treated as an emerging growth company (“EGC”) if so qualified or following earlier SEC guidance issued in May 2012;
  • Issuers are able to confidentially submit registration statements regardless of how long they have been public, which would benefit non-WKSIs (well-known seasoned issuers) in the context of follow-on offerings;
  • Public targets of de-SPAC transactions may now confidentially submit registration statements as if they were conducting an IPO; and
  • Issuers are permitted to omit underwriter names in the initial submission of the draft registration statements, allowing the SEC review process to begin earlier.

Exchange Act Registrations  

The accommodations expand the availability of nonpublic review to classes of securities registered on Forms 10, 20-F, or 40-F under both Section 12(b) and Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act (as opposed to only Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act under the prior accommodation).  Section 12(b) registration is used when a company intends to list securities on a national securities exchange, often in connection with a spin-off. In addition, when a company has total assets of more than $10 million and 2,000 record holders of its equity securities (or 500 non-accredited investors) as of the last day of its fiscal year, it must register its securities under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act.

Issuers registering under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act should note, however, that submitting a draft for nonpublic review does not satisfy the requirement that a registration statement be filed within 120 days of the end of the issuer’s fiscal year.

In addition, issuers must continue to publicly file the registration statement and draft submissions no later than 15 days prior to a road show or, in the absence of a road show, the requested effective date. Note, however, that issuers will need to publicly file Exchange Act registration statements on Forms 10, 20-F, and 40-F so that the full 30- or 60-day period, as applicable, will run prior to effectiveness.

Foreign Private Issuers

Where desired, instead of submitting draft registration statements under these new accommodations and the prior accommodations in 2017, foreign private issuers may elect to proceed in accordance with the procedures available to EGCs (if they so qualify) or follow the guidance in the SEC’s May 30, 2012 statement (the “May 2012 guidance”). The May 2012 guidance applies to (a) foreign governments listing their debt securities, (b) foreign private issuers that are already listed on non-U.S. exchanges, (c) foreign private issuers being privatized by foreign governments, or (d) foreign private issuers which can show that a public filing of an initial registration statement would conflict with the law of an applicable foreign jurisdiction.

Follow-on Securities Act Offerings and Exchange Act Registrations

The accommodations also remove the requirement that draft registration statements could only be submitted confidentially within a 12-month period following the date the issuer became subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Exchange Act.

Under the prior accommodation, due to the time limit, companies that were public for more than one year were not eligible to submit draft registration statements for nonpublic review. The new guidance now permits nonpublic review regardless of how long a company has been a public company, which would be particularly useful for non-WKSI issuers. Such issuers (whose registration statements are not automatically effective upon filing) can initially submit their registration statements, including shelf registration statements, for nonpublic review when they conduct follow-on offerings.

The SEC will continue to limit its nonpublic review to the initial submission. Accordingly, amendments to registration statements responding to staff comment must be publicly filed.

An issuer submitting an initial draft registration statement for nonpublic review should confirm in its cover letter that it will file publicly its registration statement and draft submission at least two business days prior to any requested effective time and date, which is a change from the previous 48-hour requirement. The SEC noted that it will consider reasonable requests to expedite this two business-day period and encourages issuers and their advisors to review their transaction timing with the staff of the SEC.

De-SPAC Transactions

The expanded accommodations also apply to de-SPAC transactions. Previously, a SPAC usually had to file its de-SPAC registration statement publicly if the filing occurred more than one year after the SPAC’s IPO. Under the new guidance, the target company of a de-SPAC transaction may confidentially submit a registration statement as if it were conducting an initial public offering, provided that the SPAC survives as the public company and the target company is otherwise independently eligible to submit a draft registration statement.  This approach reflects the SEC’s view that a de-SPAC transaction is the functional equivalent of the target company’s IPO.

Certain Omissions and Staff Processing

In a return to a prior accepted practice, the SEC will again permit issuers to omit the names of underwriters from initial draft submissions (despite the requirements under Regulation S-K Items 501 and 508), as long as the underwriters are disclosed in subsequent submissions and public filings, which would enable the registration process to start sooner.

In addition, the SEC has indicated that it will not delay its review process if an issuer omits certain financial information, so long as such issuer reasonably believes that such omitted financial information will not be required at the time the registration statement becomes publicly available.

In any of these circumstances, issuers must continue to take all steps to ensure that their draft registration statements are substantially complete when submitted.

Additional Information

The SEC will address any questions related to the use of such expanded processing procedures sent to [email protected].

For additional information, please see the following documents:

  • Voluntary Submission of Draft Registration Statements – FAQs
  • Fixing America’s Surface Transportation (FAST) Act – C&DIs
  • Securities Act Forms – C&DIs
  • Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act Frequently Asked Questions – Generally Applicable Questions on Title I of the JOBS Act
  • Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act Frequently Asked Questions – Confidential Submission Process for Emerging Growth Companies

Conclusion

The key effect of these accommodations is to expand the pool of issuers that can utilize the nonpublic review process, reflecting the SEC’s willingness to expedite the registration process and facilitate capital formation, as stated in the release.

Special thanks to corporate Of Counsel Marie Kwon and Rodrigo Surcan and corporate associates Kevin Mills and Spencer Becerra in our New York office for their assistance in the preparation of this post.

Share:

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.