On September 1, 2010, a division bench of the Bombay High Court held that consensual preemptive arrangements between shareholders in a public listed company do not violate the principle of free transferability of shares enshrined in section 111A of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 (“Companies Act“). In its 103-page opinion in the case of Messer Holdings Limited v. Shyam Ruia (Appeal No. 855 of 2003), the High Court overruled its previous decision in the case of Western Maharashtra Development Corporation v. Bajaj Auto [2010] 154 CompCas 593 (Bom) where it had taken a contrary view.
Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Important Opinion for Corporations with Staggered Boards
On October 8, 2010, the Court of Chancery of Delaware issued an important opinion, Airgas, Inc. v. Air Products & Chemicals, Inc. (Del. Ch. Oct. 8, 2010), with significant implications for public corporations with staggered boards. The decision arose out of the ongoing takeover battle by Air Products for control of Airgas, Inc. At Airgas’s 2010 annual meeting, held last September 15, Air Products successfully obtained all three board seats that were up for election on Airgas’s nine-member staggered board. In addition, holders of 45.8% of the shares entitled to vote at the annual meeting approved a bylaw amendment, proposed by Air Products, which would cause Airgas’s annual meeting to be held each year in the month of January as opposed to August, when Airgas’s annual meetings had historically been held. Adoption of the proposed bylaw means that Airgas’s 2011 annual meeting will take place barely four months after Airgas’s 2010 annual meeting was held, and Air Products will have the opportunity to replace a majority of Airgas’s staggered board in the space of four months. Airgas filed suit and moved to declare the bylaw amendment invalid.
Repeal of Credit Ratings Agency Exemption from Regulation FD
On September 29, 2010, the SEC amended Regulation FD to remove the express exemption for disclosures of material non-public information to credit rating agencies (former Rule 100(b)(2)(iii) of Regulation FD), as required under Section 939B of the Dodd-Frank Act. This amendment became effective upon its publication in the Federal Register on October 4, 2010.
Dodd-Frank’s “Say-on-Pay” Provisions
Orange County of counsel David C. Lee and associate Brian D. O’Neill are the authors of "Dodd-Frank’s ‘Say-on-Pay’ Provisions" [PDF] published in the October 2010 issue of Insights.
Proxy Access Litigation and Next Steps
The following provides an update on the litigation challenging the “proxy access” rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC” or “Commission”), and also discusses steps companies should consider during the pendency of the litigation. Our client alert dated August 25, 2010, available here, provided an overview of the proxy access rules.
Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Important Poison Pill Opinion
New York partner Eduardo Gallardo and associate Sharon I. Grysman are the authors of "Delaware Court of Chancery Issues Important Poison Pill Opinion" [PDF] published in the October 2010 issue of Insights.
Disclosure of Adviser Conflicts — When Is It Enough?
Investment advisers have a duty to disclose material conflicts of interest to clients. The more difficult question is: "how much disclosure is enough?" In a recent settled enforcement action, the SEC suggests that disclosure of material facts alone may not be sufficient, and that more explicit disclosure is needed when investment advice may result in additional compensation to the adviser. The case is Matter of Valentine Capital Asset Management.
Prospectus Directive amendments – discussion of key changes
London partner Dorothee Fischer-Appelt is the author of "Prospectus Directive amendments – discussion of key changes" [PDF] published in the September 2010 issue of Law and Financial Markets Review (pp. 490-498).
UK Bribery Act “Adequate Procedure” Draft Guidance Published
In anticipation of the April 2011 implementation of the new UK Bribery Act 2010 (the “Act”),[1] on September 14, 2010, the UK Ministry of Justice launched an eight-week consultation regarding the Government’s proposed guidance to commercial organisations on the prevention of bribery. The consultation features the publication of draft guidance on the “adequate procedures” defence under the Act.
Executive Compensation, Corporate Governance and Other Securities Disclosure Provisions in the Dodd-Frank U.S. Financial Regulatory Act
Washington, D.C. partners Amy Goodman, Ronald Mueller and Elizabeth Ising are the authors of "Executive Compensation, Corporate Governance and Other Securities Disclosure Provisions in the Dodd-Frank U.S. Financial Regulatory Reform Act" [PDF] published in BNA’s Securites Regulation & Law on September 20, 2010.