• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

Reminder to Respond This Week to the ISS Policy Survey

September 11, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Corporate Governance

Companies wishing to participate in Institutional Shareholder Services’ (“ISS”) annual global policy survey should do so this week. The ISS policy survey closes on September 13.  Public companies and others are urged to submit their views by completing the survey, as ISS considers the responses to its survey when developing its proxy voting policies for the coming proxy season.  When responding to the survey, it is not necessary to enter a response to every question that is asked. 

Read More

NGOs Release Report on Expectations for Conflict Minerals Reporting

September 10, 2013 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

On September 5, 2013, a white paper titled, “Expectations for Companies’ Conflict Minerals Reporting,” was released by two NGOs dedicated to human rights issues, the Enough Project and the Responsible Sourcing Network, describing in detail the expectations and suggestions of certain sustainable and responsible investors, or SRIs, and nongovernmental organizations, or NGOs, for the content of Form SD filings and Conflict Minerals Reports expected to be filed with the SEC next year.  The two groups make a number of suggestions that far-exceed the literal requirements of the SEC’s conflict minerals rules.  The paper, which is available at www.enoughproject.org/files/Expectations-for-Companies-Conflict-Minerals-Reporting.pdf, suggests that issuers disclose, among other things:

Read More

Reminder for Companies Planning to Rely on the “End-User Exception” for Swaps Activities

September 4, 2013 | Posted by Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank

On Monday, September 9, new CFTC rules will take effect for non-financial companies that use swaps to hedge or mitigate commercial risk.  These rules will require the clearing of interest rate swaps and credit default index swaps unless an exception is available.  One such exception is the “end-user exception,” and public companies planning to rely on this exception must take certain governance steps.  These include obtaining approval from the board of directors or an appropriate committee to enter into swaps exempt from clearing.  For more information on these governance steps, please see our June 17, 2013 client alert entitled “Public Companies and the ‘End-User Exception’ for Swaps: Governance Action Items,” which is available here. 

Read More

Are Changes to the Audit Report on the Horizon? PCAOB Issues Two Significant Proposals

August 13, 2013 | Posted by Michael Scanlon Topic(s): Audit Committee; Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

Today, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) proposed for public comment two audit standards that, if adopted, would significantly change the audit report model, and dramatically expand the auditor’s responsibilities in reporting on management’s disclosures outside the financial statements.  PCAOB Chairman Doty remarked that the proposed standards – running to almost 300 pages – mark a “watershed moment” for auditing in the United States.

Read More

ISS Releases Survey for 2014 Policy Updates

July 31, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Corporate Governance

Institutional Shareholder Services (“ISS”), the most influential proxy advisory firm, today launched its annual global policy survey.  Each year, ISS solicits comments in connection with its review of its proxy voting policies. At the end of this process, in November 2013, ISS will announce its updated proxy voting policies applicable to 2014 shareholders’ meetings. 

Read More

Removal of General Solicitation Ban, Bad Actor Disqualification Rules to Become Effective September 23, 2013; Comment Period on Related Proposed Amendments Also to End September 23, 2013

July 24, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

The Commission’s final rules to remove the ban on general solicitation and general advertising in offerings pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and pursuant to Rule 144A under the Securities Act, and to disqualify felons and certain other “bad actors” from participating in offerings pursuant to Rule 506, were published in the Federal Register today.  As a consequence, the final rules will become effective on September 23, 2013.

Read More

U.S. District Court Upholds SEC’s Conflict Minerals Rules

July 24, 2013 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller; James J. Moloney Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Securities Regulation

Yesterday, Judge Robert Wilkins of the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia issued a decision granting the SEC’s motion for summary judgment in a suit challenging the SEC’s conflict minerals rules, which were mandated under the Dodd-Frank Act and issued by the SEC on August 22, 2012.  As a result, the conflict minerals rules remain in effect as adopted by the SEC.  The parties have not yet indicated whether they will appeal the decision. The National Association of Manufacturers, the U.S. Chamber of Commerce and the Business Roundtable had challenged the rules in October 2012, arguing that the rules are arbitrary and capricious and impose undue costs on companies in violation of the Administrative Procedure Act of 1946 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and compel speech in violation of the First Amendment by requiring companies to make misleading disclosures suggesting that their products promote violence and human rights abuses. Rejecting the petitioners’ arguments, the court found that various aspects of the conflict minerals provision in the Dodd-Frank Act were ambiguous, and it gave deference to the SEC’s judgments, including its determination not to adopt a de minimis exception and to include within the scope of the rules issuers that “contract to manufacture” products containing conflict minerals.  In regard to the First Amendment argument, the court gave deference to Congress in light of the foreign affairs aspect of the Dodd-Frank conflict minerals provision.  The district court’s opinion is available at https://ecf.dcd.uscourts.gov/cgi-bin/show_public_doc?2013cv0635-37.

Read More

NYSE Amends Rule on Matters Requiring Shareholder Approval Under NYSE Rules

July 19, 2013 | Posted by Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Executive Compensation; Securities Regulation

The New York Stock Exchange (“NYSE”) recently amended its rules to eliminate the quorum requirement that previously applied to proposals that require shareholder approval under NYSE rules.  This rule change became effective July 11, 2013. 

Read More

SEC Approves Final Rules to Permit Advertising in Rule 506 and Rule 144A Offerings; Also Proposes Rules to Add Additional Investor Protections

July 11, 2013 | Posted by Andrew L. Fabens; Peter Wardle; Stewart McDowell Topic(s): Dodd Frank; Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act; JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

At an Open Commission Meeting on July 10, 2013, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC” or the “Commission”) adopted final rules to eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising (together, “general solicitation”) in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act, as required by Section 201(a) of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (the “JOBS Act”).  Rule 506 currently permits an issuer to raise an unlimited amount of capital in a private placement to an unlimited number of accredited investors and up to 35 non-accredited investors provided that the issuer does not engage in general solicitation; it is the most widely used exemption under Regulation D.  Rule 144A permits the resale of an unlimited amount of securities in a private transaction to qualified institutional buyers.  The Commission approved the rules by a vote of 4-1 with Commissioner Aguilar dissenting.

Read More

Guidance on Compensation Committees’ Assessment of Adviser Independence

May 22, 2013 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Brian J. Lane; Ronald O. Mueller Topic(s): Compensation Committee; Corporate Governance; Dodd Frank; Executive Compensation

As discussed in our April 26, 2013 posting on the Gibson Dunn Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor, under recently amended NYSE Rule 303A.05 and NASDAQ Rule 5605(d), board compensation committees cannot select or receive advice from a compensation consultant, legal counsel or other adviser without first taking into consideration that adviser’s independence, including consideration of the factors enumerated in the rules.  As compensation committees and their advisers are preparing for the July 1 effective date of these new listing standards, three observations are important:

Read More
  • « Go to Previous Page
  • Page 1
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 27
  • Page 28
  • Page 29
  • Page 30
  • Page 31
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 49
  • Go to Next Page »

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean C. Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.