The curtain is slowly closing on the era of (relatively) light regulation of Alternative Investment Funds in Europe. Key developments flowing from a meeting of European Finance Ministers on 19 October to discuss the ‘AIFM Directive’ include agreement on a slightly less onerous regime for depositaries and confirmation that there will eventually be a ‘passport’ regime allowing marketing of non-EU Funds on a pan-European basis. Although progress has been made, we are nonetheless concerned that the overall effect of the Directive will be to render meaningless over time the distinction between alternative funds marketed to professional investors and the (higher cost) retail funds established under the UCITS regime.
Securities Regulation
French Banking and Financial Regulation Bill: Summary of Main Provisions
On October 11, 2010, the French Parliament adopted the French Banking and Financial Regulation Statute (loi de regulation bancaire et financière).
The 100 page long Statute contains provisions significantly amending existing laws and regulations regarding, inter alia, (i) the activities and liabilities of credit rating agencies, (ii) short selling and naked short sales, (iii) temporary holding of shares before shareholders’ meetings, and (iv) mandatory takeovers.
Bombay High Court Holds That Public Listed Company Shares Can Be Subjected to Preemptive Rights
On September 1, 2010, a division bench of the Bombay High Court held that consensual preemptive arrangements between shareholders in a public listed company do not violate the principle of free transferability of shares enshrined in section 111A of the Indian Companies Act, 1956 (“Companies Act“). In its 103-page opinion in the case of Messer Holdings Limited v. Shyam Ruia (Appeal No. 855 of 2003), the High Court overruled its previous decision in the case of Western Maharashtra Development Corporation v. Bajaj Auto [2010] 154 CompCas 593 (Bom) where it had taken a contrary view.
Repeal of Credit Ratings Agency Exemption from Regulation FD
On September 29, 2010, the SEC amended Regulation FD to remove the express exemption for disclosures of material non-public information to credit rating agencies (former Rule 100(b)(2)(iii) of Regulation FD), as required under Section 939B of the Dodd-Frank Act. This amendment became effective upon its publication in the Federal Register on October 4, 2010.
Disclosure of Adviser Conflicts — When Is It Enough?
Investment advisers have a duty to disclose material conflicts of interest to clients. The more difficult question is: "how much disclosure is enough?" In a recent settled enforcement action, the SEC suggests that disclosure of material facts alone may not be sufficient, and that more explicit disclosure is needed when investment advice may result in additional compensation to the adviser. The case is Matter of Valentine Capital Asset Management.
Prospectus Directive amendments – discussion of key changes
London partner Dorothee Fischer-Appelt is the author of "Prospectus Directive amendments – discussion of key changes" [PDF] published in the September 2010 issue of Law and Financial Markets Review (pp. 490-498).
SEC Proposes Rules to Enhance Disclosure of Short-Term Borrowings and Issues Interpretive Release Regarding Disclosure of Liquidity and Capital Resources
On September 17, 2010, the Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") unanimously voted to publish for comment proposed rules that would require registrants to increase disclosure of short-term borrowing arrangements in the "Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" ("MD&A"). The SEC also unanimously voted to issue an interpretive release reiterating its long-standing guidance regarding liquidity and capital resources disclosure requirements in MD&A.
The Annual Risk Assessment Requirement for Investment Advisers: Keeping Your Review Current
Rule 206(4)-7 under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940 (the "Advisers Act") requires registered investment advisers to adopt and implement written policies and procedures that are reasonably designed to prevent violations of the Advisers Act by the adviser and any of its supervised persons within the meaning of Advisers Act section 202(a)(25). The adviser’s policies and procedures must also be reasonably designed to detect and promptly address any violations that occurred. Advisers Act Rule 206(4)-7(b) further requires investment advisers to undertake an annual review to determine the adequacy and effectiveness of their procedures in light of internal and external developments affecting the firm.
Webcast – Implementing the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act
On July 21, 2010, President Barack Obama signed into law the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, the most sweeping financial reform legislation in over a generation. Gibson Dunn panelists discuss the regulatory initiatives in the bill that are likely to be of interest and concern to the wide range of companies affected by the bill.
FASB Extends by 30 Days the Period for Comment on Proposed Changes to U.S. Accounting Standards Governing Loss Contingencies
On August 18, 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board ("FASB") announced that it is extending by 30 days to September 20, 2010 the deadline for comments on the FASB’s proposed amendments to the U.S. accounting standards governing the disclosure of loss contingencies, including litigation-related contingencies. Given the broad scope of the FASB’s proposed modifications and the challenges they would pose to financial statement preparers, we encourage companies who have not already commented on the proposal to submit comments by the new deadline.