During the 2012 proxy season, the SEC staff concurred that a number of high profile shareholder proposals could be excluded from company proxy statements because various key terms in the proposals were not adequately defined or explained within the text of the proposal and supporting statement. See e.g., WellPoint, Inc. (SEIU Master Trust) (avail. Feb. 24, 2012, recon. denied Mar. 27, 2012) (concurring with exclusion of an independent chair proposal that referred to the New York Stock Exchange standard of independence without defining it because “neither shareholders nor the company would be able to determine with any reasonable certainty exactly what actions or measures the proposal requires”); Textron Inc. (avail. Mar. 7, 2012) (arguing that a reference to the Rule 14a-8 eligibility requirements in a proxy access shareholder proposal was vague and indefinite, although the staff ultimately concurred with the exclusion of the shareholder proposal on other grounds); Dell Inc. (avail. Mar. 30, 2012) (concurring with the exclusion of a similar proxy access shareholder proposal because the proposal’s reference to the Rule 14a-8 eligibility requirements was vague and indefinite). While these no-action letters reflected long-standing SEC staff precedent, in the current proxy season, there has continued to be a large number of no-action requests arguing that various terms in shareholder proposals are undefined or vague and therefore excludable under Rule 14a-8(i)(3).
Securities Regulation
Senate Banking Committee Holds Hearing on Nomination of Mary Jo White to Chair SEC
The Senate Committee on Banking, Housing and Urban Affairs held a hearing today on the nomination of Mary Jo White to chair the Securities and Exchange Commission. The Senators showed high support for White’s nomination and, contrary to expectation, asked few tough questions about her ties to Wall Street banks arising from her work at the law firm Debevoise & Plimpton LLP and other potential conflicts of interest.
U.S. Supreme Court Issues Two Significant Decisions Involving Securities Law Matters
On February 27, 2013, the U.S. Supreme Court issued opinions in two significant securities law cases, Gabelli v. Securities and Exchange Commission, 568 U.S. ___ (2013) and Amgen Inc., v. Connecticut Retirement Plans and Trust Funds, 568 U.S. ___ (2013). In the Gabelli decision the Court addressed the ability of the government to bring civil enforcement actions seeking civil penalties where the alleged fraudulent conduct occurred outside the five-year statute of limitations period. In the Amgen decision the Court addressed the class certification pleading requirements in security holder class action suits.
SEC Petitioned for Rulemaking to Accelerate 13F Filing Deadline
Last week, the NYSE Euronext, the Society of Corporate Secretaries and Governance Professionals, and the National Investor Relations Institute submitted a joint petition (available here) to the SEC, requesting that the Commission amend the beneficial ownership reporting rules under Section 13(f) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. Fund managers subject to the 13(f) reporting requirements currently have until 45 days after the last day of each calendar quarter to file their Form 13F; the petition suggests that the time period be shortened to two business days.
Court Holds that Nonconvertible Securities with Different Voting Rights Not Matchable under Section 16(b)
Last week, in Gibbons v. Malone, the Second Circuit affirmed the lower court’s dismissal of a shareholder suit brought under Section 16(b) of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934 against a former director of Discovery Communications, Inc. Also known as the short swing profit rule, Section 16(b) provides for the disgorgement of any profits earned from the purchase and sale, or sale and purchase, by a corporate insider, of any equity security within a six-month period. In Gibbons, the corporate insider sold Series C common stock, which had no voting rights, and purchased Series A common stock which had voting rights, within a six-month period. The three-judge panel held that absent SEC guidance, the purchase and sale of different types of stock in the same company, where those securities are separately traded, nonconvertible, and come with different voting rights cannot be matched, and therefore do not trigger the short swing profit rule.
SEC Approves PCAOB Auditing Standard No. 16 – Communications with Audit Committees
Yesterday, the SEC issued an order approving new Auditing Standard No. 16, Communications with Audit Committees (“AS 16”). AS 16 was previously approved by the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) at an open meeting held on August 15, 2012. As we noted in our August client alert reporting on this new standard (available here), AS 16 retains most of the preexisting communication requirements, but also adds a number of new topics that the auditor must discuss with the audit committee and requires that the auditor seek specific responses from the audit committee when discussing certain topics. In response to comments, the SEC also clarified that the new standard will apply to audits of foreign private issuers. Significantly, the SEC concurred with the PCAOB that AS 16 will apply to emerging growth companies (“ECGs”) and will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on and after December 15, 2012.
Corp Fin Allows Company To Cease Reporting Stating Company’s Stock Is Not a Security
The SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance recently granted no-action relief that allows an SEC reporting company, Minn-Dak Farmers Cooperative, to cease reporting on the basis that the company’s common and preferred stock are not “securities” under the federal securities laws.
Departure of SEC Chairman Schapiro Creates Uncertainty Regarding Rules to Remove the General Solicitation Ban in Certain Private Offerings
On November 26, 2012, SEC Chairman Mary Schapiro announced that she will leave the Commission on Friday, December 14. Commissioner Elisse Walter will take over as Chairman.
On August 29, 2012, the SEC proposed rules to implement Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act, which requires the SEC to eliminate the prohibition against general solicitation and general advertising (together, “general solicitation”) in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and Rule 144A under the Securities Act. The Commission voted 4-1 to propose the rules, with Democratic Commissioner Aguilar as the lone dissent, but Commissioner Walter, also a Democrat, expressed reservations about the proposal in her opening statement at the Commission’s meeting. Republican Commissioners Gallagher and Paredes strongly supported the proposed rules.
New Process for Submitting Draft Registration Statements and Amendments
Draft Registration Statements to Be Submitted and Filed on EDGAR
On September 26, 2012, the SEC’s Division of Corporation Finance announced that, beginning on Monday, October 1, 2012, Emerging Growth Companies and foreign private issuers may voluntarily submit their draft registration statements and amendments for confidential, non-public staff review using either the current secure email system or through a new EDGAR-based submission process.
SEC Raises ’33 Act Registration Fees
The SEC recently announced that Securities Act registration fees that companies are required to pay in connection with registered securities offerings will increase significantly. Effective October 1st, the current fee of $114.60 per million dollars of securities offered will increase to $136.40 per million dollars, representing an increase of more than 19 percent.