• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
Robert B. Little

Robert B. Little

Partner, Dallas

[email protected]

+1 214.698.3260

Robert B. Little is a partner in Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher’s Dallas office. He is a Global Co-Chair of the Mergers and Acquisitions Practice Group and a member of the firm's Executive Committee.

View Full Profile

Schedule 13G “Passive” Investor Status – When Being A Little Active Is Still Passive!

July 16, 2016 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Robert B. Little; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Executive Compensation; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation; Shareholder Proposals

On Thursday, July 14, 2016, the Staff in the Division of Corporation Finance posted a new C&DI on Section 13(d) that provides stockholders (and issuers) with some helpful insights, and perhaps greater clarity, on when significant stockholders can engage in a dialogue with management and still remain on Schedule 13G.  As many practitioners know, Schedule 13G (the “short form” for reporting beneficial ownership of equity positions of 5% or more) often requires an affirmative certification from the reporting person(s) that the securities were not acquired, and are not held, with the purpose or effect of changing or influencing control of the issuer.   This is commonly referred to as the “passive” investor certification which is set forth at the end of Schedule 13G, directly above the signature line. 

Read More

Private Placement of Publicly Traded Equity Securities as Consideration in an M&A Transaction after the JOBS Act

October 3, 2013 | Posted by Robert B. Little; James J. Moloney Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

In April 2012, we wrote here about the potential future impact of the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”) on M&A transactions in which an acquirer seeks to issue its privately placed equity securities as consideration in an acquisition.  Our discussion at the time focused on the conditions of Rule 506 of Regulation D under the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”) and, in particular, the tension faced by issuers that are required to determine the offerees’ status as “accredited investors” or as otherwise suitable to evaluate the potential investment.  We noted that such issuers have historically been prohibited from using any form of “general solicitation” when offering securities in such transactions.  Subsequently, in July 2013, the SEC adopted final rules (effective September 23, 2013) to eliminate the absolute prohibition against general solicitation in securities offerings conducted pursuant to Rule 506, as required by Section 201(a) of the JOBS Act (Gibson Dunn’s summary and analysis of the rules may be found here).  The following discussion updates our earlier post to address the legal and practical effects of these new rules for M&A transactions that include a private placement component.

Read More

Proposed Amendments to DGCL Section 251 Increasing Attractiveness of Tender Offer Structure

April 7, 2013 | Posted by James J. Moloney; Andrew L. Fabens; Ari Lanin; Robert B. Little; Brian J. Lane Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

The Delaware State bar recently proposed an amendment to Section 251 of the Delaware General Corporation Law (DGCL) to add new subparagraph (h) that would greatly enhance the appeal of the tender offer over a one-step merger structure. 

Read More

Private Placement of Publicly Traded Equity Securities as Consideration in an M&A Transaction after the JOBS Act

April 18, 2012 | Posted by Robert B. Little Topic(s): JOBS Act; Securities Regulation

An issuer with equity securities that are publicly traded often seeks to use its equity securities as consideration in an acquisition of another business.  If the target business is privately held, the acquirer may seek to privately place the equity securities with the owners of the target rather than registering the securities due to the lead-time required for the registration process or for other reasons.  The following discussion addresses many of the securities law issues that public companies should consider when using privately placed equity as acquisition currency, including a discussion of upcoming changes in the private placement landscape precipitated by the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act (“JOBS Act”), signed into law by President Obama on April 5, 2012.

Read More

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.