• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

Post-Shutdown Guidance for Registration Statements: Stay the Course or Get in Line

November 14, 2025 | Posted by Atma Kabad; Hillary H. Holmes; Andrew L. Fabens; Stewart McDowell; Peter Wardle; Jinhua Zhang Topic(s): Corporate Governance; Securities Regulation

With the U.S. government reopening after a 43-day shutdown, the Securities and Exchange Commission Division of Corporation Finance (the “Division”) issued new Q&As on November 13, 2025 addressing certain post-shutdown issues, including the treatment of pending registration statements and proxy statements that were filed during the shutdown. Importantly, the guidance provides that:

  • Issuers that filed new or amended registration statements without a delaying amendment during the government shutdown do not need to file an amendment to their registration statements to add a delaying amendment. Those registration statements will still become effective automatically 20 days after the filing date under Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 (the “Securities Act”).
  • Issuers that filed new or amended registration statements without a delaying amendment during the government shutdown can still rely on Rule 430A, which provides a basis for companies to launch IPOs with a price range on the cover of their prospectus notwithstanding that the registration statement will become effective automatically.
  • If an issuer that filed a registration statement without a delaying amendment wishes to have the registration statement declared effective before the automatic 20-day period ends, it will need to file an amendment to its registration statement to include a delaying amendment and request acceleration under Rule 461.
  • For proxy statements and information statements, companies may proceed to file definitive materials once the 10-day waiting period has passed, even if the preliminary versions were filed during the government shutdown, except if the Division indicated that it would review the filing prior to the government shutdown.

The Division reminded issuers that the liability and anti-fraud provisions of the federal securities laws apply to registration statements that go effective automatically under Section 8(a), and that such issuers must ensure their filings do not contain material misstatements or omissions of material information required to be stated therein or necessary to make the statements therein not misleading. The Division also indicated that it would continue to review filings that were under review or which the Division indicated that it would review prior to the government shutdown in the order in which the filings were received.

The Division indicated that issuers filed over 900 registration statements during the shutdown and that the staff of the Division will review filings in the order in which they were received, suggesting that response times for comment letters, waivers and interpretive requests may initially take longer than usual until the backlog is cleared. Nevertheless, the guidance reflects the SEC’s intent not to impede IPOs and other securities offerings, allowing companies that filed during the shutdown to proceed under multiple paths.

Gibson Dunn’s lawyers are available to assist with any questions you may have regarding the SEC’s latest guidance and related compliance considerations under federal securities laws and regulations.

Share:

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Alisa Babitz

J. Alan Bannister

Cléo Batista

Carla Baum

Aaron K. Briggs

Becky Chung

Michael Collins

Sydney Colopy

Colin B. Davis

Georgia Derbyshire

Matthew L. Dolloff

Julie Doria

Justine Y. Drohan

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sebastian L. Fain

Sean C. Feller

Pierre-Emmanuel Fender

Tull Florey

Jonathan D. Fortney

Thomas W. Franck

Ferdinand M. Fromholzer

Muriel Hague

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Atma Kabad

Saad Khan

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Marie M. Kwon

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Kristen C. Limarzi

Robert B. Little

Vanessa Ludwig

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

Hank Michael

Babette Milz

Mark H. Mixon Jr.

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Johannes Reul

Annie Saunders

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Meghan Sherley

Gerry Spedale

Matt Staugaard

Rodrigo Surcan

Michael A. Titera

Nicholas Tok

Harrison Tucker

Maggie Valachovic

Geoffrey E. Walter

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

William L. Wortmann

Mason F Ye

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society for Corporate Governance
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • TheCorporateCounsel.net
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky Blog
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2026 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.