• Skip to main content
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Securities Regulation and Corporate Governance Monitor

  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe
  • Home
  • About
  • Editors
  • Topics
  • Subscribe

Proxy Reporting of 5% Shareholders’ Beneficial Ownership Based on 13G Filings

February 21, 2025 | Posted by Elizabeth A. Ising; Lori Zyskowski; Ronald O. Mueller; Stella Kwak Topic(s): Disclosure; Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings; Securities Regulation

Among the many new rules and considerations affecting proxy season disclosures this year, one of the more subtle changes affects beneficial ownership disclosure pursuant to S-K Item 403(a). That rule requires companies to report the beneficial ownership of their greater than 5% shareholders “as of the most recent practicable date,” with beneficial ownership being determined in accordance with Exchange Act Rule 13d-3.  In years past, all Schedule 13G filers were required to file amendments within 45 days after the end of the calendar year to report any change to their previously reported holdings. Companies traditionally have relied on those year-end filings for purposes of completing the Item 403(a) beneficial ownership table in their proxy statements. Under the amendments to the Schedule 13D/G reporting rules that went into effect in September 2024, greater than 5% beneficial owners reporting on Schedule 13G now are required to file a Schedule 13G/A within 45 days after the end of any calendar quarter if, as of the end of the calendar quarter, there are any material changes in the information reported in the previous filing. A material change would include an acquisition or disposition of beneficial ownership of securities in an amount equal to one percent or more of the outstanding class of securities.  However, absent a triggering acquisition or disposition or other material change, Schedule 13G filers are no longer required to file an amendment reporting their beneficial ownership as of the end of the calendar year.

Under Instruction 3 to S-K Item 403(a), companies are entitled to rely on the most recently filed Schedule 13G when preparing the beneficial ownership table for their proxy statement, unless the company knows or has reason to believe that the most recently filed 13G is not complete or accurate or that a statement or amendment should have been filed and was not. However, the mere fact that an institutional shareholder is reporting different ownership on its quarterly Form 13-F does not mean that a company “knows or has reason to believe” that the information in the most recently filed Schedule 13G may no longer be relied upon. As the SEC Staff confirmed in S-K C&DI 229.02, the concept of “investment discretion” that is used for reporting on Form 13-F is not the same as “beneficial ownership” for purposes of Schedule 13D and 13G reporting.

Accordingly, absent some other basis for knowing or believing that a Schedule 13G is no longer accurate, companies should continue to rely on the most recently filed Schedule 13G when preparing the beneficial ownership table for their proxy statement, even when that most recent Schedule 13G is more than a year old.  When preparing the proxy beneficial ownership table, we recommend that companies drop a footnote indicating the date as of which the shareholder’s beneficial ownership was reported in the Schedule 13G, and preferably also the filing date of the Schedule 13G that the company is relying on (the same applies with respect to shareholders reporting on Schedule 13D). Companies also should confirm that any lead-in language to the beneficial ownership table stating that ownership is reported as of a specific date is qualified by language along the lines of, “except to the extent indicated otherwise in the footnotes”.

 

Share:

Primary Sidebar

Topics

Audit Committee

Capital Markets

Compensation Committee

Corporate Governance

Disclosure

Dodd Frank

Environmental/Climate Change

ESG

EU Regulation

Executive Compensation

FCPA

Financial Statements

Human Capital Management

India Regulation

Investment Act/Investment Advisors Act

IPOs

JOBS Act

M&A

Miscellaneous

Private Placements

Proxy Access

Proxy Statements and Annual Meetings

Registered Securities Offerings

Registration Statements

Say on Pay

Securities Regulation

Shareholder Proposals

UK Regulation

Underwriters and Agents

Whistleblower Rules

Editors

Lauren M. Assaf-Holmes

J. Alan Bannister

Aaron K. Briggs

Michael Collins

Boris Dolgonos

Mellissa Campbell Duru

Andrew L. Fabens

Sean Feller

Tull Florey

Gina Hancock

Krista P. Hanvey

Lauren Hebson

Hillary H. Holmes

Elizabeth A. Ising

Thomas J. Kim

David Korvin

Stella Kwak

Brian J. Lane

Ari Lanin

Julia Lapitskaya

Robert B. Little

Cynthia M. Mabry

Stewart McDowell

Gregory Merz

James J. Moloney

Ronald O. Mueller

Michael K. Murphy

Ekaterina (Kate) Napalkova

Justine Robinson

Michael Scanlon

Eric Scarazzo

Elvia Soto

Gerry Spedale

Jack Strachan

Michael A. Titera

Tracey Tomlinson

Harrison Tucker

Peter Wardle

David C. Ware

Robyn Zolman

Lori Zyskowski

Useful Links

  • Gibson Dunn Website
  • Society of Corporate Secretaries & Governance Professionals
  • Institutional Shareholder Services
  • New York Stock Exchange
  • NASDAQ
  • SEC
  • Conference Board’s Center for Corporate Governance
  • Glass Lewis & Co., Inc.
  • The Corporate Counsel
  • CompensationStandards.com
  • Romeo & Dye’s Section 16.net
  • Harvard Law School Forum on Corporate Governance and Securities Regulation
  • National Association of Corporate Directors
  • Columbia Law Blue Sky
  • COVID-19 Resources for Public Companies
  • ESG Resources for Public Companies

Archives

Subscribe to Updates
RSS Feed
  • Privacy Statement
  • Cookie Notice
  • Contact Us
© 2025 Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP. All rights reserved.