On March 30, 2010, the Supreme Court issued its decision in Jones v. Harris Associates L.P., No. 08-586. The Court construed Section 36(b) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, which states that investment advisers to mutual funds are deemed to have a fiduciary duty with respect to the receipt of compensation for services and provides a private cause of action for breach of that duty.
Archives for March 2010
Financial Regulatory Reform: Chairman Dodd Releases New Legislation to Reform Financial Services Industry Regulation and Enhance Consumer Protection
Gibson Dunn is closely tracking government responses to the recent turmoil that has catalyzed a dramatic and rapid reshaping of our capital and credit markets. We are providing updates on key regulatory and legislative issues, as well as information on legal and oversight issues that we believe could prove useful as firms and other entities navigate these changing times.
Delaware Court of Chancery Validates Use of a Net Operating Loss Poison Pill
On February 26, 2010, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware issued an important opinion validating the use of a net operating loss (NOL) shareholder rights plan or poison pill.[1] The case, Selectica, Inc. v. Versata, Inc.,[2] arose out of the intentional triggering of Selectica’s NOL rights plan in December 2008 by its competitor Trilogy and Trilogy’s subsidiary, Versata Enterprises. The decision provides boards of directors of Delaware corporations with guidance as to the steps they should take in adopting and implementing an NOL rights plan. It also reflects Delaware courts’ continuing deference to well-informed boards that run a methodical and well-reasoned process, even in the face of the so-called Unocal enhanced standard of review.
SEC Amends E-Proxy Rules
The Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") recently approved amendments to its notice and access (e-proxy) rules that are designed to increase participation in the e-proxy process. Under the prior e-proxy rules, the SEC mandated the exact form and content that had to appear on the Notice of Internet Availability (the "Notice"). Concerns have been expressed that the Notice rules limited the ability of issuers to communicate effectively about the e-proxy process, which resulted in lower shareholder participation rates for e-proxy, particularly among retail investors.
Formula Pricing: “Day 20” Pricing Has Finally Arrived for Debt Tender Offers!
Orange County partner James Moloney is the author of “Formula Pricing: ‘Day 20’ Pricing Has Finally Arrived for Debt Tender Offers!” [PDF] published in the March-April 2010 issue of Deal Lawyers.